From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling"
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:38:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180225163855.GC17626@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80586c54-2a59-04ef-a623-78d340ba6206@gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 02:00:43PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 03.02.2018 um 21:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 05:41:54PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> This commit forces callers of phy_resume() and phy_suspend() to hold
> >> mutex phydev->lock. This was done for calls to phy_resume() and
> >> phy_suspend() in phylib, however there are more callers in network
> >> drivers. I'd assume that these other calls issue a warning now
> >> because of the lock not being held.
> >> So is there something I miss or would this have to be fixed?
> >
> > Hi Heiner
> >
> > This is a good point.
> >
> > Yes, it looks like some fixes are needed. But what exactly?
> >
> The issue with phy_suspend/phy_resume and the changed locking
> behavior is still open AFAICS. There was a proposed fix
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg215455.html
> and then the discussion stopped.
> I think we need the fix before 4.16 leaves the rc phase.
Hi Heiner
I have a patch i will post later today.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-25 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-03 16:41 Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling" Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-03 20:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-02-03 23:58 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-04 2:48 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-02-05 21:48 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-06 11:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-02-06 12:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-02-07 20:56 ` handling of phy_stop() and phy_stop_machine() in phylib Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-07 21:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-02-07 23:03 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-02-25 13:00 ` Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling" Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-25 16:38 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180225163855.GC17626@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).