netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling"
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:38:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180225163855.GC17626@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80586c54-2a59-04ef-a623-78d340ba6206@gmail.com>

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 02:00:43PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 03.02.2018 um 21:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 05:41:54PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> This commit forces callers of phy_resume() and phy_suspend() to hold
> >> mutex phydev->lock. This was done for calls to phy_resume() and
> >> phy_suspend() in phylib, however there are more callers in network
> >> drivers. I'd assume that these other calls issue a warning now
> >> because of the lock not being held.
> >> So is there something I miss or would this have to be fixed?
> > 
> > Hi Heiner
> > 
> > This is a good point.
> > 
> > Yes, it looks like some fixes are needed. But what exactly?
> > 
> The issue with phy_suspend/phy_resume and the changed locking
> behavior is still open AFAICS. There was a proposed fix
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg215455.html
> and then the discussion stopped.
> I think we need the fix before 4.16 leaves the rc phase.

Hi Heiner

I have a patch i will post later today.

  Andrew

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-25 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-03 16:41 Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling" Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-03 20:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-02-03 23:58   ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-04  2:48     ` Florian Fainelli
2018-02-05 21:48       ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-06 11:00         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-02-06 12:55           ` Andrew Lunn
2018-02-07 20:56       ` handling of phy_stop() and phy_stop_machine() in phylib Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-07 21:13         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-02-07 23:03           ` Florian Fainelli
2018-02-25 13:00   ` Potential issue with f5e64032a799 "net: phy: fix resume handling" Heiner Kallweit
2018-02-25 16:38     ` Andrew Lunn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180225163855.GC17626@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).