netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mst@redhat.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
	christoffer.dall@linaro.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net 2/3] tuntap: disable preemption during XDP processing
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:02:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226120209.3c3b172b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519443146-9089-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:32:25 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> Except for tuntap, all other drivers' XDP was implemented at NAPI
> poll() routine in a bh. This guarantees all XDP operation were done at
> the same CPU which is required by e.g BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY. But

There is a typo in the defined name "BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY".
Besides it is NOT a requirement that comes from the map type
BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY.

The requirement comes from the bpf_redirect_map helper (and only partly
devmap + cpumap types), as the BPF helper/program stores information in
the per-cpu redirect_info struct (see filter.c), that is used by
xdp_do_redirect() and xdp_do_flush_map().

 struct redirect_info {
	u32 ifindex;
	u32 flags;
	struct bpf_map *map;
	struct bpf_map *map_to_flush;
	unsigned long   map_owner;
 };
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct redirect_info, redirect_info);

 [...]
 void xdp_do_flush_map(void)
 { 
	struct redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&redirect_info);
	struct bpf_map *map = ri->map_to_flush;
 [...]

Notice the same redirect_info is used by the TC clsbpf system...


> for tuntap, we do it in process context and we try to protect XDP
> processing by RCU reader lock. This is insufficient since
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU can preempt the RCU reader critical section which
> breaks the assumption that all XDP were processed in the same CPU.
> 
> Fixing this by simply disabling preemption during XDP processing.

I guess, this could pamper over the problem...

But I generally find it problematic that the tuntap is not invoking XDP
from NAPI poll() routine in BH-context, as that context provided us
with some protection that allow certain kind of optimizations (like
this flush API).  I hope this will not limit us in the future, that
tuntap driver violate the XDP call context.

> Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")

$ git describe --contains 761876c857cb
v4.14-rc1~130^2~270^2
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-24  3:32 [PATCH V4 net 1/3] Revert "tuntap: add missing xdp flush" Jason Wang
2018-02-24  3:32 ` [PATCH V4 net 2/3] tuntap: disable preemption during XDP processing Jason Wang
2018-02-26 11:02   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2018-02-26 13:43     ` Jason Wang
2018-02-26 18:50   ` David Miller
2018-02-24  3:32 ` [PATCH V4 net 3/3] tuntap: correctly add the missing XDP flush Jason Wang
2018-02-26 18:50   ` David Miller
2018-02-26 18:50 ` [PATCH V4 net 1/3] Revert "tuntap: add missing xdp flush" David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180226120209.3c3b172b@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).