From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v3 8/8] iplink: Reduce number of arguments to iplink_parse()
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:35:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226133556.1e24b6d1@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a57a5871-86d6-0988-ad5b-cc57d9cf1f76@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2749 bytes --]
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 22:09:03 +0200
Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com> wrote:
> Serhey Popovych wrote:
> > David Ahern wrote:
> >> On 2/26/18 11:20 AM, Serhey Popovych wrote:
> >>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:02:06 +0200
> >>>> Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +struct iplink_parse_args {
> >>>>> + const char *dev;
> >>>>> + const char *name;
> >>>>> + const char *type;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* This definitely must be the last one and initialized
> >>>>> + * by the caller of iplink_parse() that will initialize rest.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> + struct iplink_req *req;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>
> >>>> No control block please.
> >>> Accepted.
> >>>
> >>>> If you have too many arguments, then that means you need to do
> >>>> some refactoring.
> >>>
> >>> So using structure as single argument to a function isn't an option?
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> As I mentioned before, iplink_parse should not be used by vxcan or veth
> >> as they only want a subset of the parsing. Once you take those users
> >> out, iplink_parse becomes local to iplink.c with a single user. In which
> >> case I suspect the compiler will always inline the function so no
> >> refactoring on the number of arguments is needed.
> >>
> > I will implement cut down function to parse vxcan and veth peer device
> > parameters and reuse it in iplink_parse() to avoid code duplications.
> >
> > But my final goal not to refactor on number of arguments to parse,
> > that's side product of this series, I want to take @name, @dev and
> > other parameters for later use. In ->parse_opt() modules @name, @dev
> > and others are not available easily. It seems only way to get them is
> > to parse supplied netlink buffer.
> >
> >
> While looking on how to make iplink_parse_light() that will be used with
> vxcan and veth I found following problems:
>
> 1) need to copy nearly all parameters parsing code (except vf, alias,
> carrier, master, protodown, link-netnsid, addrgenmode). this will
> be mitigated by re using iplink_parse_light() in iplink_parse()
>
> 2) how to add attributes like IFLA_GROUP? in caller? this will give
> even more code duplications.
>
> 3) there is high risk of adding regression either via conflicting
> matches() parameter in userspace or missing kernel attribute
> previously supported.
>
> Sorry, I do not like this approach. I do not want to broke anything,
> I just want @name and @dev parameters in ->parse_opt().
>
>
> 2)
> >
If the work to use common code is bigger than the code itself
then why bother. There is no benefit.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 13:01 [PATCH iproute2-next v3 0/8] iplink: Improve iplink_parse() Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:01 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 1/8] utils: Introduce and use nodev() helper routine Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 2/8] iplink: Correctly report error when network device isn't found Serhey Popovych
2018-02-23 23:41 ` David Ahern
2018-02-25 12:07 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 3/8] iplink: Use "dev" and "name" parameters interchangeable when possible Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 4/8] iplink: Follow documented behaviour when "index" is given Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 5/8] veth,vxcan: Save/reinitialize/restore whole @struct ifinfomsg Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 3:28 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 15:48 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 15:57 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 6/8] iplink: Perform most of request buffer setups and checks in iplink_parse() Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 3:31 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 15:51 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 7/8] iplink: Move data structures to block of their users Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 8/8] iplink: Reduce number of arguments to iplink_parse() Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 3:35 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 15:44 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 16:07 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 18:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-26 18:20 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 18:27 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 18:38 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 20:09 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 21:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180226133556.1e24b6d1@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serhe.popovych@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).