From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 1/4] virtio_net: disable XDP_REDIRECT in receive_mergeable() case
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 02:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227023529-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151913352486.28247.12339812865877070160.stgit@firesoul>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 02:32:04PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The virtio_net code have three different RX code-paths in receive_buf().
> Two of these code paths can handle XDP, but one of them is broken for
> at least XDP_REDIRECT.
>
> Function(1): receive_big() does not support XDP.
> Function(2): receive_small() support XDP fully and uses build_skb().
> Function(3): receive_mergeable() broken XDP_REDIRECT uses napi_alloc_skb().
>
> The simple explanation is that receive_mergeable() is broken because
> it uses napi_alloc_skb(), which violates XDP given XDP assumes packet
> header+data in single page and enough tail room for skb_shared_info.
>
> The longer explaination is that receive_mergeable() tries to
> work-around and satisfy these XDP requiresments e.g. by having a
> function xdp_linearize_page() that allocates and memcpy RX buffers
> around (in case packet is scattered across multiple rx buffers). This
> does currently satisfy XDP_PASS, XDP_DROP and XDP_TX (but only because
> we have not implemented bpf_xdp_adjust_tail yet).
>
> The XDP_REDIRECT action combined with cpumap is broken, and cause hard
> to debug crashes. The main issue is that the RX packet does not have
> the needed tail-room (SKB_DATA_ALIGN(skb_shared_info)), causing
> skb_shared_info to overlap the next packets head-room (in which cpumap
> stores info).
>
> Reproducing depend on the packet payload length and if RX-buffer size
> happened to have tail-room for skb_shared_info or not. But to make
> this even harder to troubleshoot, the RX-buffer size is runtime
> dynamically change based on an Exponentially Weighted Moving Average
> (EWMA) over the packet length, when refilling RX rings.
>
> This patch only disable XDP_REDIRECT support in receive_mergeable()
> case, because it can cause a real crash.
>
> IMHO we should consider NOT supporting XDP in receive_mergeable() at
> all, because the principles behind XDP are to gain speed by (1) code
> simplicity, (2) sacrificing memory and (3) where possible moving
> runtime checks to setup time. These principles are clearly being
> violated in receive_mergeable(), that e.g. runtime track average
> buffer size to save memory consumption.
>
> In the longer run, we should consider introducing a separate receive
> function when attaching an XDP program, and also change the memory
> model to be compatible with XDP when attaching an XDP prog.
I agree with a separate function approach.
So each buffer is tagged as xdp/non xdp, we check that
and handle appropriately - where non xdp could be handled
by the generic path.
> Fixes: 186b3c998c50 ("virtio-net: support XDP_REDIRECT")
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 626c27352ae2..0ca91942a884 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -677,7 +677,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> unsigned int truesize;
> unsigned int headroom = mergeable_ctx_to_headroom(ctx);
> - int err;
>
> head_skb = NULL;
>
> @@ -754,12 +753,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> goto err_xdp;
> rcu_read_unlock();
> goto xdp_xmit;
> - case XDP_REDIRECT:
> - err = xdp_do_redirect(dev, &xdp, xdp_prog);
> - if (!err)
> - *xdp_xmit = true;
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - goto xdp_xmit;
> default:
> bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
> case XDP_ABORTED:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 13:31 [net PATCH 0/4] virtio_net: several bugs in XDP code for driver virtio_net Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-20 13:32 ` [net PATCH 1/4] virtio_net: disable XDP_REDIRECT in receive_mergeable() case Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-20 16:56 ` John Fastabend
2018-02-27 0:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-02-27 2:25 ` Jason Wang
2018-02-27 2:28 ` Jason Wang
2018-02-20 13:32 ` [net PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: fix XDP code path in receive_small() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-20 16:57 ` John Fastabend
2018-02-20 13:32 ` [net PATCH 3/4] virtio_net: fix memory leak in XDP_REDIRECT Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-20 16:59 ` John Fastabend
2018-02-20 13:32 ` [net PATCH 4/4] virtio_net: fix ndo_xdp_xmit crash towards dev not ready for XDP Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-02-20 17:01 ` John Fastabend
2018-02-21 20:09 ` [net PATCH 0/4] virtio_net: several bugs in XDP code for driver virtio_net David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227023529-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).