From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:41:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180301094129.29fb6ce6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519874345-10235-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:19:04 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> XDP_REDIRECT support for mergeable buffer was removed since commit
> 7324f5399b06 ("virtio_net: disable XDP_REDIRECT in receive_mergeable()
> case"). This is because we don't reserve enough tailroom for struct
> skb_shared_info which breaks XDP assumption. Other complaints are, the
> complex linearize logic and EWMA estimation may increase the
> possibility of linearizing.
This patch also have the intermixing issues, I mentioned for patch 2/2.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:02:06 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> 1. XDP generic is not feature complete, e.g. cpumap will drop these
> packets. It might not be possible to implement some features, think
> of (AF_XDP) zero-copy.
>
> 2. This can easily cause out-of-order packets.
>
> 3. It makes it harder to troubleshoot, when diagnosing issues
> around #1, we have a hard time determining what path an XDP packet
> took (the xdp tracepoints doesn't know).
It is slightly better, as it is consistent in calling XDP-generic in
the XDP_REDIRECT action, which an action under heavy development, here
we want the freedom to develop in different code tempi. And some
features might never be available in XDP-generic. Thus, when a feature
is missing/broken it will be consistent for the user.
The remaining question is how will a user know that XDP "mode" she is
using? The user clearly loaded an XDP-native program, and expect the
associated performance, but XDP_REDIRECT will be using the slow
XDP-generic code path...
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 9bb9e56..81190ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
[...]
> @@ -689,31 +709,30 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> unsigned int truesize;
> unsigned int headroom = mergeable_ctx_to_headroom(ctx);
> - bool sent;
> + bool sent, skb_xdp = false;
> + int err;
>
> head_skb = NULL;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> if (xdp_prog) {
> - struct page *xdp_page;
> struct xdp_buff xdp;
> void *data;
> u32 act;
>
> - /* This happens when rx buffer size is underestimated */
> + /* This happens when rx buffer size is underestimated
> + * or headroom is not enough because of the buffer
> + * was refilled before XDP is set. In both cases,
> + * for simplicity, we will offload them to generic
> + * XDP routine. This should only happen for the first
> + * several packets, so we don't care much about its
> + * performance.
> + */
> if (unlikely(num_buf > 1 ||
> headroom < virtnet_get_headroom(vi))) {
I think you also need to check the tailroom here? (AFAIK this is hidden
in the len_to_ctx as the "truesize").
> - /* linearize data for XDP */
> - xdp_page = xdp_linearize_page(rq, &num_buf,
> - page, offset,
> - VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM,
> - &len);
> - if (!xdp_page)
> - goto err_xdp;
> - offset = VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM;
> - } else {
> - xdp_page = page;
> + skb_xdp = true;
> + goto skb_xdp;
> }
>
> /* Transient failure which in theory could occur if
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-01 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 3:19 [PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer Jason Wang
2018-03-01 3:19 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] " Jason Wang
2018-03-01 8:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2018-03-01 9:11 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-03-02 4:20 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 3:19 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: simplify XDP handling in small buffer Jason Wang
2018-03-01 8:02 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-03-01 8:49 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 9:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-03-01 9:24 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 9:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio-net: re enable XDP_REDIRECT for mergeable buffer Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-03-01 9:23 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 10:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-03-01 13:15 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 14:16 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-03-02 4:17 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-01 13:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180301094129.29fb6ce6@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).