public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: Stefan Chulski <stefanc@marvell.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yan Markman <ymarkman@marvell.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	"gregory.clement@bootlin.com" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	"miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	"mw@semihalf.com" <mw@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: use a data size of 10kB for Tx FIFO on port 0
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 10:25:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180304102518.1963cb8a@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd3a0e716e1c44938b7a216ea54b9c7e@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>

Hello,

On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 06:29:59 +0000, Stefan Chulski wrote:

> > Is there a reason to hardcode 10KB for port 0, and 3KB for the other ports ?
> > Would there be use cases where the user may want different configurations
> > ?
> 
> Design requirement are 10KB TX FIFO for the 10Gb/sec and 2.5KB for the 2.5Gb/sec.

What is a "design requirement" ? Is it a HW design limitation ?

> Since only port 0 support 10Gb/sec and ports 1&2 support up to 2.5Gb/sec.
> I don't see any reason to change this configurations.
> Also TX FIFO size could be set only during probe.
> 
> > It's just that it feels very "hardcoded" to enforce specifically those numbers.
> > 
> > Also, does it make sense to mention the CP110 here ? Is this 19 KB limitation
> > a limit of the PPv2.2 IP, or of the CP110 ?  
> 
> PPv2.2 IP is part of 110 communication processor.

Thanks, I know this :-)

> Next communication processor will has different Packet processor or next generation of PPv2.x
> Limit is PPv2.2 TX FIFO.

So, the limitation has nothing to do with CP110 really, it's just a
limitation of PPv2.2, and mentioning CP110 in the comment doesn't make
much sense, correct ?

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-04  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-02 15:40 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: mvpp2: jumbo frames support Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: mvpp2: use the same buffer pool for all ports Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 16:01   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-04  6:59     ` Stefan Chulski
2018-03-05 10:48     ` Antoine Tenart
2018-03-05 12:41       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-05 12:56         ` Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: mvpp2: update the BM buffer free/destroy logic Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: use a data size of 10kB for Tx FIFO on port 0 Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 16:11   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-04  6:29     ` Stefan Chulski
2018-03-04  9:25       ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-03-04  9:33         ` Stefan Chulski
2018-03-02 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: mvpp2: enable UDP/TCP checksum over IPv6 Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: mvpp2: jumbo frames support Antoine Tenart
2018-03-02 16:17   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-04  6:56     ` Stefan Chulski
2018-03-04  9:28       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-04  9:42         ` Stefan Chulski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180304102518.1963cb8a@windsurf.home \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
    --cc=ymarkman@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox