From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no
 numa support
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:59:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20180307.145928.456070038633384401.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180306151004.31336-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
        <20180307.132500.40232199631094354.davem@davemloft.net>
        <1a84294d-babc-e4ff-1e2f-9265450fee8f@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: anders.roxell@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        shuahkh@osg.samsung.com
To: shuah@kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1a84294d-babc-e4ff-1e2f-9265450fee8f@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 12:51:06 -0700

> That said, I am open to adding a distinct state for skipped because
> can't be run.

That is what I think should happen.