From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the net-next
 tree
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 15:24:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20180307.152423.215706756372582141.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <CAHC9VhTUORhy1dADEza8tr4DW6gTjqxXyg0wb0cwFCRy+WRkMQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <20180307.124500.1863183408172828694.davem@davemloft.net>
        <CAHC9VhRQb50EYD6BVTxNv2x=S_tTLq57OZBsWbXFdfJEunNUiA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        richard_c_haines@btinternet.com
To: paul@paul-moore.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRQb50EYD6BVTxNv2x=S_tTLq57OZBsWbXFdfJEunNUiA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:20:33 -0500

> I suppose the right thing would have been for net-next
> to pull selinux/next, yes?

Nope.