From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [RFC] netfilter: cttimeout: remove VLA in ctnl_timeout_parse_policy Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 23:04:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20180311220414.feda33aw72zw2rko@salvia> References: <20180306184755.GA7628@embeddedgus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180306184755.GA7628@embeddedgus> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:47:55PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA and replace it > with dynamic memory allocation. Looks good but... > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c > index 95b0470..a2f7d92 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c > @@ -52,18 +52,26 @@ ctnl_timeout_parse_policy(void *timeouts, > struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr) > { > int ret = 0; > + struct nlattr **tb = NULL; I think we don't need to initialize this, right? > > if (likely(l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_to_obj)) { > - struct nlattr *tb[l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_max+1]; > + tb = kcalloc(l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_max + 1, sizeof(*tb), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (!tb) > + return -ENOMEM; > > ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_max, > attr, l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nla_policy, > NULL); > if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > + goto err; > > ret = l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_to_obj(tb, net, timeouts); > } > + > +err: > + kfree(tb); > return ret; > } > > -- > 2.7.4 >