From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:58657 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752385AbeCOOjj (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:39:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:39:30 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Vicen?iu Galanopulo <vicentiu.galanopulo@nxp.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inphi IN112525 PHY
Message-ID: <20180315143930.GB28577@lunn.ch>
References: <HE1PR0402MB35781CC11AAC5DB372D194CFEED00@HE1PR0402MB3578.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0402MB35781CC11AAC5DB372D194CFEED00@HE1PR0402MB3578.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> I have a patch ready for this, but we would like to know if this is right way to go about this.

Please post the patch, so we can review it.

What you are proposing sounds O.K, but we should also try to put some
pressure on vendors to conform to the standard. Have you asked them if
a firmware update can fix this?

       Andrew