From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38442 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751429AbeCTG7j (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:59:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2K6xMA7095308 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:59:38 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gtvw7s6cn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:59:38 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 06:59:36 -0000 From: Julian Wiedmann To: David Miller Cc: , , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Stefan Raspl , Ursula Braun , Julian Wiedmann Subject: [PATCH net 3/4] s390/qeth: lock read device while queueing next buffer Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:59:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180320065915.62076-1-jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180320065915.62076-1-jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20180320065915.62076-4-jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: For calling ccw_device_start(), issue_next_read() needs to hold the device's ccwlock. This is satisfied for the IRQ handler path (where qeth_irq() gets called under the ccwlock), but we need explicit locking for the initial call by the MPC initialization. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann --- drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c index 42ee8806fa53..2a9afaf8f264 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c @@ -527,8 +527,7 @@ static inline int qeth_is_cq(struct qeth_card *card, unsigned int queue) queue == card->qdio.no_in_queues - 1; } - -static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card) +static int __qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card) { int rc; struct qeth_cmd_buffer *iob; @@ -559,6 +558,17 @@ static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card) return rc; } +static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card) +{ + int ret; + + spin_lock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card))); + ret = __qeth_issue_next_read(card); + spin_unlock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card))); + + return ret; +} + static struct qeth_reply *qeth_alloc_reply(struct qeth_card *card) { struct qeth_reply *reply; @@ -1182,7 +1192,7 @@ static void qeth_irq(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm, return; if (channel == &card->read && channel->state == CH_STATE_UP) - qeth_issue_next_read(card); + __qeth_issue_next_read(card); iob = channel->iob; index = channel->buf_no; -- 2.13.5