netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Fix operstate for virtio when no VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:07:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180322220540-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23981.1521729761@nyx>

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:42:41PM +0000, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	The operstate update logic will leave an interface in the
> default UNKNOWN operstate if the interface carrier state never changes
> from the default carrier up state set at creation.  This includes the
> case of an explicit call to netif_carrier_on, as the carrier on to on
> transition has no effect on operstate.
> 
> 	This affects virtio-net for the case that the virtio peer does
> not support VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS (the feature that provides carrier state
> updates).  Without this feature, the virtio specification states that
> "the link should be assumed active," so, logically, the operstate should
> be UP instead of UNKNOWN.  This has impact on user space applications
> that use the operstate to make availability decisions for the interface.
> 
> 	Resolve this by changing the virtio probe logic slightly to call
> netif_carrier_off for both the "with" and "without" VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS
> cases, and then the existing call to netif_carrier_on for the "without"
> case will cause an operstate transition.
> 
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>

Arguably userspace apps should learn to treat UNKNOWN as UP.
But on the balance this seems more likely to fix apps than to
break any, so

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>


> ---
> 
> 	I considered resolving this by changing linkwatch_init_dev to
> unconditionally call rfc2863_policy, as that would always set operstate
> for all interfaces.
> 
> 	This would not have any impact on most cases (as most drivers
> call netif_carrier_off during probe), except for the loopback device,
> which currently has an operstate of UNKNOWN (because it never does any
> carrier state transitions).  This change would add a round trip on the
> dev_base_lock for every loopback device creation, which could have a
> negative impact when creating many loopback devices, e.g., when
> concurrently creating large numbers of containers.
> 
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 23374603e4d9..7b187ec7411e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -2857,8 +2857,8 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  	/* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
>  	   otherwise get link status from config. */
> +	netif_carrier_off(dev);
>  	if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) {
> -		netif_carrier_off(dev);
>  		schedule_work(&vi->config_work);
>  	} else {
>  		vi->status = VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> -- 
> 2.14.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-22 14:42 [PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Fix operstate for virtio when no VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS Jay Vosburgh
2018-03-22 20:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-03-23 16:17 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180322220540-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).