From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:54571 "EHLO
        out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751953AbeCXPFT (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 11:05:19 -0400
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:05:16 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
        weiwan@google.com, kafai@fb.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 00/21] net/ipv6: Separate data structures
 for FIB and data path
Message-ID: <20180324150516.GA8940@splinter>
References: <20180319033622.16693-1-dsahern@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180319033622.16693-1-dsahern@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:36:01PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> This set is the first of many changes to improve the scalability of the
> IPv6 code. Follow on changes include:
> - consolidating duplicate fib6_info references like IPv4 does with
>   duplicate fib_info

Before that you need to further break fib6_info into fib6_info and
fib6_alias, or I misunderstood you?