netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb
@ 2018-03-21 23:31 Yonghong Song
  2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] " Yonghong Song
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2018-03-21 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edumazet, ast, daniel, diptanu, netdev; +Cc: kernel-team

One of our in-house projects, bpf-based NAT, hits a kernel BUG_ON at
function skb_segment(), line 3667. The bpf program attaches to
clsact ingress, calls bpf_skb_change_proto to change protocol
from ipv4 to ipv6 or from ipv6 to ipv4, and then calls bpf_redirect
to send the changed packet out.
 ...
    3665                 while (pos < offset + len) {
    3666                         if (i >= nfrags) {
    3667                                 BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
 ...

The triggering input skb has the following properties:
    list_skb = skb->frag_list;
    skb->nfrags != NULL && skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
and skb_segment() is not able to handle a frag_list skb
if its headlen (list_skb->len - list_skb->data_len) is not 0.

Patch #1 provides a simple solution to avoid BUG_ON. If
list_skb->head_frag is true, its page-backed frag will
be processed before the list_skb->frags.
Patch #2 provides a test case in test_bpf module which
constructs a skb and calls skb_segment() directly. The test
case is able to trigger the BUG_ON without Patch #1.

The patch has been tested in the following setup:
  ipv6_host <-> nat_server <-> ipv4_host
where nat_server has a bpf program doing ipv4<->ipv6
translation and forwarding through clsact hook
bpf_skb_change_proto.

Changelog:
v5 -> v6:
  . Added back missed BUG_ON(!nfrags) for zero
    skb_headlen(skb) case, plus a couple of
    cosmetic changes, from Alexander.
v4 -> v5:
  . Replace local variable head_frag with
    a static inline function skb_head_frag_to_page_desc
    which gets the head_frag on-demand. This makes
    code more readable and also does not increase
    the stack size, from Alexander.
  . Remove the "if(nfrags)" guard for skb_orphan_frags
    and skb_zerocopy_clone as I found that they can
    handle zero-frag skb (with non-zero skb_headlen(skb))
    properly.
  . Properly release segment list from skb_segment()
    in the test, from Eric.
v3 -> v4:
  . Remove dynamic memory allocation and use rewinding
    for both index and frag to remove one branch in fast path,
    from Alexander.
  . Fix a bunch of issues in test_bpf skb_segment() test,
    including proper way to allocate skb, proper function
    argument for skb_add_rx_frag and not freeint skb, etc.,
    from Eric.
v2 -> v3:
  . Use starting frag index -1 (instead of 0) to
    special process head_frag before other frags in the skb,
    from Alexander Duyck.
v1 -> v2:
  . Removed never-hit BUG_ON, spotted by Linyu Yuan.

Yonghong Song (2):
  net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb
  net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module

 lib/test_bpf.c    | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 net/core/skbuff.c | 27 +++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.5

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb
  2018-03-21 23:31 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb Yonghong Song
@ 2018-03-21 23:31 ` Yonghong Song
  2018-03-22  0:32   ` Alexander Duyck
  2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module Yonghong Song
  2018-03-25 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb David Miller
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2018-03-21 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edumazet, ast, daniel, diptanu, netdev; +Cc: kernel-team

One of our in-house projects, bpf-based NAT, hits a kernel BUG_ON at
function skb_segment(), line 3667. The bpf program attaches to
clsact ingress, calls bpf_skb_change_proto to change protocol
from ipv4 to ipv6 or from ipv6 to ipv4, and then calls bpf_redirect
to send the changed packet out.

3472 struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
3473                             netdev_features_t features)
3474 {
3475         struct sk_buff *segs = NULL;
3476         struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
...
3665                 while (pos < offset + len) {
3666                         if (i >= nfrags) {
3667                                 BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
3668
3669                                 i = 0;
3670                                 nfrags = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->nr_frags;
3671                                 frag = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->frags;
3672                                 frag_skb = list_skb;
...

call stack:
...
 #1 [ffff883ffef03558] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8110c525
 #2 [ffff883ffef03620] crash_kexec at ffffffff8110d5cc
 #3 [ffff883ffef03640] oops_end at ffffffff8101d7e7
 #4 [ffff883ffef03668] die at ffffffff8101deb2
 #5 [ffff883ffef03698] do_trap at ffffffff8101a700
 #6 [ffff883ffef036e8] do_error_trap at ffffffff8101abfe
 #7 [ffff883ffef037a0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff8101acd0
 #8 [ffff883ffef037b0] invalid_op at ffffffff81a00bab
    [exception RIP: skb_segment+3044]
    RIP: ffffffff817e4dd4  RSP: ffff883ffef03860  RFLAGS: 00010216
    RAX: 0000000000002bf6  RBX: ffff883feb7aaa00  RCX: 0000000000000011
    RDX: ffff883fb87910c0  RSI: 0000000000000011  RDI: ffff883feb7ab500
    RBP: ffff883ffef03928   R8: 0000000000002ce2   R9: 00000000000027da
    R10: 000001ea00000000  R11: 0000000000002d82  R12: ffff883f90a1ee80
    R13: ffff883fb8791120  R14: ffff883feb7abc00  R15: 0000000000002ce2
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
 #9 [ffff883ffef03930] tcp_gso_segment at ffffffff818713e7
--- <IRQ stack> ---
...

The triggering input skb has the following properties:
    list_skb = skb->frag_list;
    skb->nfrags != NULL && skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
and skb_segment() is not able to handle a frag_list skb
if its headlen (list_skb->len - list_skb->data_len) is not 0.

This patch addressed the issue by handling skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
case properly if list_skb->head_frag is true, which is expected in
most cases. The head frag is processed before list_skb->frags
are processed.

Reported-by: Diptanu Gon Choudhury <diptanu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 715c134..4e1d4e7 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3460,6 +3460,19 @@ void *skb_pull_rcsum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_pull_rcsum);
 
+static inline skb_frag_t skb_head_frag_to_page_desc(struct sk_buff *frag_skb)
+{
+	skb_frag_t head_frag;
+	struct page *page;
+
+	page = virt_to_head_page(frag_skb->head);
+	head_frag.page.p = page;
+	head_frag.page_offset = frag_skb->data -
+		(unsigned char *)page_address(page);
+	head_frag.size = skb_headlen(frag_skb);
+	return head_frag;
+}
+
 /**
  *	skb_segment - Perform protocol segmentation on skb.
  *	@head_skb: buffer to segment
@@ -3664,15 +3677,19 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
 
 		while (pos < offset + len) {
 			if (i >= nfrags) {
-				BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
-
 				i = 0;
 				nfrags = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->nr_frags;
 				frag = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->frags;
 				frag_skb = list_skb;
+				if (!skb_headlen(list_skb)) {
+					BUG_ON(!nfrags);
+				} else {
+					BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag);
 
-				BUG_ON(!nfrags);
-
+					/* to make room for head_frag. */
+					i--;
+					frag--;
+				}
 				if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
 				    skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb,
 						       GFP_ATOMIC))
@@ -3689,7 +3706,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
 				goto err;
 			}
 
-			*nskb_frag = *frag;
+			*nskb_frag = (i < 0) ? skb_head_frag_to_page_desc(frag_skb) : *frag;
 			__skb_frag_ref(nskb_frag);
 			size = skb_frag_size(nskb_frag);
 
-- 
2.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module
  2018-03-21 23:31 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb Yonghong Song
  2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] " Yonghong Song
@ 2018-03-21 23:31 ` Yonghong Song
  2018-03-25 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb David Miller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2018-03-21 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edumazet, ast, daniel, diptanu, netdev; +Cc: kernel-team

Without the previous commit,
"modprobe test_bpf" will have the following errors:
...
[   98.149165] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   98.159362] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3667!
[   98.169756] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   98.179370] Modules linked in:
[   98.179371]  test_bpf(+)
...
which triggers the bug the previous commit intends to fix.

The skbs are constructed to mimic what mlx5 may generate.
The packet size/header may not mimic real cases in production. But
the processing flow is similar.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index 2efb213..a468b5c 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -6574,6 +6574,93 @@ static bool exclude_test(int test_id)
 	return test_id < test_range[0] || test_id > test_range[1];
 }
 
+static __init struct sk_buff *build_test_skb(void)
+{
+	u32 headroom = NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN + ETH_HLEN;
+	struct sk_buff *skb[2];
+	struct page *page[2];
+	int i, data_size = 8;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+		page[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!page[i]) {
+			if (i == 0)
+				goto err_page0;
+			else
+				goto err_page1;
+		}
+
+		/* this will set skb[i]->head_frag */
+		skb[i] = dev_alloc_skb(headroom + data_size);
+		if (!skb[i]) {
+			if (i == 0)
+				goto err_skb0;
+			else
+				goto err_skb1;
+		}
+
+		skb_reserve(skb[i], headroom);
+		skb_put(skb[i], data_size);
+		skb[i]->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
+		skb_reset_network_header(skb[i]);
+		skb_set_mac_header(skb[i], -ETH_HLEN);
+
+		skb_add_rx_frag(skb[i], 0, page[i], 0, 64, 64);
+		// skb_headlen(skb[i]): 8, skb[i]->head_frag = 1
+	}
+
+	/* setup shinfo */
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_size = 1448;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_type = SKB_GSO_TCPV4;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_type |= SKB_GSO_DODGY;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_segs = 0;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->frag_list = skb[1];
+
+	/* adjust skb[0]'s len */
+	skb[0]->len += skb[1]->len;
+	skb[0]->data_len += skb[1]->data_len;
+	skb[0]->truesize += skb[1]->truesize;
+
+	return skb[0];
+
+err_skb1:
+	__free_page(page[1]);
+err_page1:
+	kfree_skb(skb[0]);
+err_skb0:
+	__free_page(page[0]);
+err_page0:
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static __init int test_skb_segment(void)
+{
+	netdev_features_t features;
+	struct sk_buff *skb, *segs;
+	int ret = -1;
+
+	features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL | NETIF_F_IP_CSUM |
+		   NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM;
+	features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
+	skb = build_test_skb();
+	if (!skb) {
+		pr_info("%s: failed to build_test_skb", __func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	segs = skb_segment(skb, features);
+	if (segs) {
+		kfree_skb_list(segs);
+		ret = 0;
+		pr_info("%s: success in skb_segment!", __func__);
+	} else {
+		pr_info("%s: failed in skb_segment!", __func__);
+	}
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+done:
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static __init int test_bpf(void)
 {
 	int i, err_cnt = 0, pass_cnt = 0;
@@ -6632,9 +6719,11 @@ static int __init test_bpf_init(void)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = test_bpf();
-
 	destroy_bpf_tests();
-	return ret;
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return test_skb_segment();
 }
 
 static void __exit test_bpf_exit(void)
-- 
2.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb
  2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] " Yonghong Song
@ 2018-03-22  0:32   ` Alexander Duyck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Duyck @ 2018-03-22  0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yonghong Song
  Cc: Eric Dumazet, ast, Daniel Borkmann, diptanu, Netdev, Kernel Team

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
> One of our in-house projects, bpf-based NAT, hits a kernel BUG_ON at
> function skb_segment(), line 3667. The bpf program attaches to
> clsact ingress, calls bpf_skb_change_proto to change protocol
> from ipv4 to ipv6 or from ipv6 to ipv4, and then calls bpf_redirect
> to send the changed packet out.
>
> 3472 struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
> 3473                             netdev_features_t features)
> 3474 {
> 3475         struct sk_buff *segs = NULL;
> 3476         struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
> ...
> 3665                 while (pos < offset + len) {
> 3666                         if (i >= nfrags) {
> 3667                                 BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
> 3668
> 3669                                 i = 0;
> 3670                                 nfrags = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->nr_frags;
> 3671                                 frag = skb_shinfo(list_skb)->frags;
> 3672                                 frag_skb = list_skb;
> ...
>
> call stack:
> ...
>  #1 [ffff883ffef03558] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8110c525
>  #2 [ffff883ffef03620] crash_kexec at ffffffff8110d5cc
>  #3 [ffff883ffef03640] oops_end at ffffffff8101d7e7
>  #4 [ffff883ffef03668] die at ffffffff8101deb2
>  #5 [ffff883ffef03698] do_trap at ffffffff8101a700
>  #6 [ffff883ffef036e8] do_error_trap at ffffffff8101abfe
>  #7 [ffff883ffef037a0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff8101acd0
>  #8 [ffff883ffef037b0] invalid_op at ffffffff81a00bab
>     [exception RIP: skb_segment+3044]
>     RIP: ffffffff817e4dd4  RSP: ffff883ffef03860  RFLAGS: 00010216
>     RAX: 0000000000002bf6  RBX: ffff883feb7aaa00  RCX: 0000000000000011
>     RDX: ffff883fb87910c0  RSI: 0000000000000011  RDI: ffff883feb7ab500
>     RBP: ffff883ffef03928   R8: 0000000000002ce2   R9: 00000000000027da
>     R10: 000001ea00000000  R11: 0000000000002d82  R12: ffff883f90a1ee80
>     R13: ffff883fb8791120  R14: ffff883feb7abc00  R15: 0000000000002ce2
>     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
>  #9 [ffff883ffef03930] tcp_gso_segment at ffffffff818713e7
> --- <IRQ stack> ---
> ...
>
> The triggering input skb has the following properties:
>     list_skb = skb->frag_list;
>     skb->nfrags != NULL && skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
> and skb_segment() is not able to handle a frag_list skb
> if its headlen (list_skb->len - list_skb->data_len) is not 0.
>
> This patch addressed the issue by handling skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
> case properly if list_skb->head_frag is true, which is expected in
> most cases. The head frag is processed before list_skb->frags
> are processed.
>
> Reported-by: Diptanu Gon Choudhury <diptanu@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

This looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb
  2018-03-21 23:31 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb Yonghong Song
  2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] " Yonghong Song
  2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module Yonghong Song
@ 2018-03-25 20:47 ` David Miller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2018-03-25 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yhs; +Cc: edumazet, ast, daniel, diptanu, netdev, kernel-team

From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:31:02 -0700

> One of our in-house projects, bpf-based NAT, hits a kernel BUG_ON at
> function skb_segment(), line 3667. The bpf program attaches to
> clsact ingress, calls bpf_skb_change_proto to change protocol
> from ipv4 to ipv6 or from ipv6 to ipv4, and then calls bpf_redirect
> to send the changed packet out.
>  ...
>     3665                 while (pos < offset + len) {
>     3666                         if (i >= nfrags) {
>     3667                                 BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb));
>  ...
> 
> The triggering input skb has the following properties:
>     list_skb = skb->frag_list;
>     skb->nfrags != NULL && skb_headlen(list_skb) != 0
> and skb_segment() is not able to handle a frag_list skb
> if its headlen (list_skb->len - list_skb->data_len) is not 0.
> 
> Patch #1 provides a simple solution to avoid BUG_ON. If
> list_skb->head_frag is true, its page-backed frag will
> be processed before the list_skb->frags.
> Patch #2 provides a test case in test_bpf module which
> constructs a skb and calls skb_segment() directly. The test
> case is able to trigger the BUG_ON without Patch #1.
> 
> The patch has been tested in the following setup:
>   ipv6_host <-> nat_server <-> ipv4_host
> where nat_server has a bpf program doing ipv4<->ipv6
> translation and forwarding through clsact hook
> bpf_skb_change_proto.

Series applied, however I'm still not %100 convinced that allowing this
kind of protocol and MSS sized mucked GRO packet is a good idea.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-25 20:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-21 23:31 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb Yonghong Song
2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] " Yonghong Song
2018-03-22  0:32   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module Yonghong Song
2018-03-25 20:47 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).