[PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

[PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

[Jisheng Zhang]

This series tries to optimize the mvneta's suspend/resume
implementation by only taking necessary actions.

Jisheng Zhang (2):
  net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts
  net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
2.16.3

[PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts

[Jisheng Zhang]

This is to prepare the suspend/resume improvement in next patch. The
SW parts can be optimized out during resume.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 30aab9bf77cc..4ec69bbd1eb4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -2796,10 +2796,8 @@ static void mvneta_rx_reset(struct mvneta_port *pp)
 
 /* Rx/Tx queue initialization/cleanup methods */
 
-/* Create a specified RX queue */
-static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
-			   struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
-
+static int mvneta_rxq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
+			      struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
 {
 	rxq->size = pp->rx_ring_size;
 
@@ -2812,6 +2810,12 @@ static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 
 	rxq->last_desc = rxq->size - 1;
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void mvneta_rxq_hw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
+			       struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
+{
 	/* Set Rx descriptors queue starting address */
 	mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_BASE_ADDR_REG(rxq->id), rxq->descs_phys);
 	mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_SIZE_REG(rxq->id), rxq->size);
@@ -2835,6 +2839,20 @@ static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 		mvneta_rxq_short_pool_set(pp, rxq);
 		mvneta_rxq_non_occup_desc_add(pp, rxq, rxq->size);
 	}
+}
+
+/* Create a specified RX queue */
+static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
+			   struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
+
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mvneta_rxq_sw_init(pp, rxq);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	mvneta_rxq_hw_init(pp, rxq);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2857,9 +2875,8 @@ static void mvneta_rxq_deinit(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 	rxq->descs_phys        = 0;
 }
 
-/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
-static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
-			   struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
+static int mvneta_txq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
+			      struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
@@ -2872,7 +2889,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 	txq->tx_stop_threshold = txq->size - MVNETA_MAX_SKB_DESCS;
 	txq->tx_wake_threshold = txq->tx_stop_threshold / 2;
 
-
 	/* Allocate memory for TX descriptors */
 	txq->descs = dma_alloc_coherent(pp->dev->dev.parent,
 					txq->size * MVNETA_DESC_ALIGNED_SIZE,
@@ -2882,14 +2898,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 
 	txq->last_desc = txq->size - 1;
 
-	/* Set maximum bandwidth for enabled TXQs */
-	mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_CFG_REG(txq->id), 0x03ffffff);
-	mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_COUNT_REG(txq->id), 0x3fffffff);
-
-	/* Set Tx descriptors queue starting address */
-	mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_BASE_ADDR_REG(txq->id), txq->descs_phys);
-	mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_SIZE_REG(txq->id), txq->size);
-
 	txq->tx_skb = kmalloc_array(txq->size, sizeof(*txq->tx_skb),
 				    GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!txq->tx_skb) {
@@ -2910,7 +2918,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 				  txq->descs, txq->descs_phys);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	mvneta_tx_done_pkts_coal_set(pp, txq, txq->done_pkts_coal);
 
 	/* Setup XPS mapping */
 	if (txq_number > 1)
@@ -2923,6 +2930,35 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void mvneta_txq_hw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
+			       struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
+{
+	/* Set maximum bandwidth for enabled TXQs */
+	mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_CFG_REG(txq->id), 0x03ffffff);
+	mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_COUNT_REG(txq->id), 0x3fffffff);
+
+	/* Set Tx descriptors queue starting address */
+	mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_BASE_ADDR_REG(txq->id), txq->descs_phys);
+	mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_SIZE_REG(txq->id), txq->size);
+
+	mvneta_tx_done_pkts_coal_set(pp, txq, txq->done_pkts_coal);
+}
+
+/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
+static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
+			   struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mvneta_txq_sw_init(pp, txq);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	mvneta_txq_hw_init(pp, txq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* Free allocated resources when mvneta_txq_init() fails to allocate memory*/
 static void mvneta_txq_deinit(struct mvneta_port *pp,
 			      struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
-- 
2.16.3

[PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

[Jisheng Zhang]

Current suspend/resume implementation reuses the mvneta_open() and
mvneta_close(), but it could be optimized to take only necessary
actions during suspend/resume.

One obvious problem of current implementation is: after hundreds of
system suspend/resume cycles, the resume of mvneta could fail due to
fragmented dma coherent memory. After this patch, the non-necessary
memory alloc/free is optimized out.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 4ec69bbd1eb4..1870f1dd7093 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4575,14 +4575,46 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int mvneta_suspend(struct device *device)
 {
+	int queue;
 	struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
 	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
 
-	rtnl_lock();
-	if (netif_running(dev))
-		mvneta_stop(dev);
-	rtnl_unlock();
+	if (!netif_running(dev))
+		return 0;
+
 	netif_device_detach(dev);
+
+	mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
+
+	if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+		spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+		pp->is_stopped = true;
+		spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+
+		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+						    &pp->node_online);
+		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+						    &pp->node_dead);
+	}
+
+	for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+		struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+		mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
+	}
+
+	for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+		struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+		/* Set minimum bandwidth for disabled TXQs */
+		mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_CFG_REG(txq->id), 0);
+		mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_COUNT_REG(txq->id), 0);
+
+		/* Set Tx descriptors queue starting address and size */
+		mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_BASE_ADDR_REG(txq->id), 0);
+		mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_SIZE_REG(txq->id), 0);
+	}
+
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
 	return 0;
@@ -4593,7 +4625,7 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(device);
 	struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
 	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
-	int err;
+	int err, queue;
 
 	clk_prepare_enable(pp->clk);
 	if (!IS_ERR(pp->clk_bus))
@@ -4614,13 +4646,37 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	if (!netif_running(dev))
+		return 0;
+
 	netif_device_attach(dev);
-	rtnl_lock();
-	if (netif_running(dev)) {
-		mvneta_open(dev);
-		mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
+
+	for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+		struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+		rxq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+		mvneta_rxq_hw_init(pp, rxq);
 	}
-	rtnl_unlock();
+
+	for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+		struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+		txq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+		mvneta_txq_hw_init(pp, txq);
+	}
+
+	if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+		spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+		pp->is_stopped = false;
+		spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+		cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+						 &pp->node_online);
+		cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+						 &pp->node_dead);
+	}
+
+	mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
+	mvneta_start_dev(pp);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.16.3

Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:13:56 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> This is to prepare the suspend/resume improvement in next patch. The
> SW parts can be optimized out during resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>

Thanks, I have two very minor nits below, but otherwise:

Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

> +/* Create a specified RX queue */
> +static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> +			   struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> +
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = mvneta_rxq_sw_init(pp, rxq);
> +	if (ret)

Here you're testing if (ret), while in mvneta_txq_init(), in the same
situation, you're doing if (ret < 0). I don't have a preference for one
or the other, but having them consistent between the two lpaces would
be nice.

> -/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
> -static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> -			   struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> +static int mvneta_txq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> +			      struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
>  {
>  	int cpu;
>  
> @@ -2872,7 +2889,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>  	txq->tx_stop_threshold = txq->size - MVNETA_MAX_SKB_DESCS;
>  	txq->tx_wake_threshold = txq->tx_stop_threshold / 2;
>  
> -

Spurious change.

Thanks!

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Jisheng,

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:15:36 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Current suspend/resume implementation reuses the mvneta_open() and
> mvneta_close(), but it could be optimized to take only necessary
> actions during suspend/resume.
> 
> One obvious problem of current implementation is: after hundreds of
> system suspend/resume cycles, the resume of mvneta could fail due to
> fragmented dma coherent memory. After this patch, the non-necessary
> memory alloc/free is optimized out.

Indeed, this needs to be fixed, you're totally right.

> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index 4ec69bbd1eb4..1870f1dd7093 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -4575,14 +4575,46 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int mvneta_suspend(struct device *device)
>  {
> +	int queue;
>  	struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
>  	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
> -	rtnl_lock();
> -	if (netif_running(dev))
> -		mvneta_stop(dev);
> -	rtnl_unlock();
> +	if (!netif_running(dev))
> +		return 0;

This is changing the behavior I believe. The current code is:

        rtnl_lock();
        if (netif_running(dev))
                mvneta_stop(dev);
        rtnl_unlock();
        netif_device_detach(dev);
        clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
        clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
        return 0;

So, when netif_running(dev) is false, we're indeed not calling
mvneta_stop(), but we're still doing netif_device_detach(), and
disabling the clocks. With your change, we're no longer doing these
steps.

> +
>  	netif_device_detach(dev);
> +
> +	mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
> +
> +	if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
> +		spin_lock(&pp->lock);
> +		pp->is_stopped = true;
> +		spin_unlock(&pp->lock);

Real question: is it OK to set pp->is_stopped *after* calling
mvneta_stop_dev(), while it was set before calling mvneta_stop_dev() in
the current code ?

> +
> +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
> +						    &pp->node_online);
> +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
> +						    &pp->node_dead);

Do we need to remove/add those CPU notifiers when suspending/resuming ?

> +	}
> +
> +	for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
> +		struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
> +
> +		mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
> +	}

Wouldn't it make sense to have
mvneta_rxq_sw_deinit/mvneta_rxq_hw_deinit(), like you did for the
initialization ?

> +
> +	for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
> +		struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
> +
> +		/* Set minimum bandwidth for disabled TXQs */
> +		mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_CFG_REG(txq->id), 0);
> +		mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_COUNT_REG(txq->id), 0);
> +
> +		/* Set Tx descriptors queue starting address and size */
> +		mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_BASE_ADDR_REG(txq->id), 0);
> +		mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_SIZE_REG(txq->id), 0);
> +	}

Same comment here: a mvneta_txq_sw_deinit()/mvneta_txq_hw_deinit()
would be good, and would avoid duplicating this logic.

> +
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -4593,7 +4625,7 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(device);
>  	struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
>  	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	int err;
> +	int err, queue;
>  
>  	clk_prepare_enable(pp->clk);
>  	if (!IS_ERR(pp->clk_bus))
> @@ -4614,13 +4646,37 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!netif_running(dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	netif_device_attach(dev);
> -	rtnl_lock();
> -	if (netif_running(dev)) {
> -		mvneta_open(dev);
> -		mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
> +
> +	for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
> +		struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
> +
> +		rxq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
> +		mvneta_rxq_hw_init(pp, rxq);
>  	}
> -	rtnl_unlock();
> +
> +	for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
> +		struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
> +
> +		txq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
> +		mvneta_txq_hw_init(pp, txq);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
> +		spin_lock(&pp->lock);
> +		pp->is_stopped = false;
> +		spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
> +		cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
> +						 &pp->node_online);
> +		cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
> +						 &pp->node_dead);
> +	}
> +
> +	mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
> +	mvneta_start_dev(pp);

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi,

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:42:59 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:13:56 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > This is to prepare the suspend/resume improvement in next patch. The
> > SW parts can be optimized out during resume.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>  
> 
> Thanks, I have two very minor nits below, but otherwise:
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Thanks for reviewing.

> 
> > +/* Create a specified RX queue */
> > +static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > +			   struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> > +
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = mvneta_rxq_sw_init(pp, rxq);
> > +	if (ret)  
> 
> Here you're testing if (ret), while in mvneta_txq_init(), in the same
> situation, you're doing if (ret < 0). I don't have a preference for one
> or the other, but having them consistent between the two lpaces would
> be nice.

updated in v2.

> 
> > -/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
> > -static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > -			   struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > +static int mvneta_txq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > +			      struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> >  {
> >  	int cpu;
> >  
> > @@ -2872,7 +2889,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> >  	txq->tx_stop_threshold = txq->size - MVNETA_MAX_SKB_DESCS;
> >  	txq->tx_wake_threshold = txq->tx_stop_threshold / 2;
> >  
> > -  
> 
> Spurious change.

There's an extra blank line here, so I removed it ;)

Thanks

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

[Jisheng Zhang]

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:54:32 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> Hello Jisheng,

Hi Thomas,

> 
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:15:36 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Current suspend/resume implementation reuses the mvneta_open() and
> > mvneta_close(), but it could be optimized to take only necessary
> > actions during suspend/resume.
> > 
> > One obvious problem of current implementation is: after hundreds of
> > system suspend/resume cycles, the resume of mvneta could fail due to
> > fragmented dma coherent memory. After this patch, the non-necessary
> > memory alloc/free is optimized out.  
> 
> Indeed, this needs to be fixed, you're totally right.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > index 4ec69bbd1eb4..1870f1dd7093 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > @@ -4575,14 +4575,46 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >  static int mvneta_suspend(struct device *device)
> >  {
> > +	int queue;
> >  	struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
> >  	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
> >  
> > -	rtnl_lock();
> > -	if (netif_running(dev))
> > -		mvneta_stop(dev);
> > -	rtnl_unlock();
> > +	if (!netif_running(dev))
> > +		return 0;  
> 
> This is changing the behavior I believe. The current code is:
> 
>         rtnl_lock();
>         if (netif_running(dev))
>                 mvneta_stop(dev);
>         rtnl_unlock();
>         netif_device_detach(dev);
>         clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
>         clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
>         return 0;
> 
> So, when netif_running(dev) is false, we're indeed not calling
> mvneta_stop(), but we're still doing netif_device_detach(), and
> disabling the clocks. With your change, we're no longer doing these
> steps.

Indeed, will try to keep the behavior in v2

> 
> > +
> >  	netif_device_detach(dev);
> > +
> > +	mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
> > +
> > +	if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
> > +		spin_lock(&pp->lock);
> > +		pp->is_stopped = true;
> > +		spin_unlock(&pp->lock);  
> 
> Real question: is it OK to set pp->is_stopped *after* calling
> mvneta_stop_dev(), while it was set before calling mvneta_stop_dev() in
> the current code ?

oops, you are right. Fixed in v2

> 
> > +
> > +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
> > +						    &pp->node_online);
> > +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
> > +						    &pp->node_dead);  
> 
> Do we need to remove/add those CPU notifiers when suspending/resuming ?

Take mvneta_cpu_online() as an example, if we don't remove it during
suspend, when system is resume back, it will touch mac when secondary
cpu is ON, but at this point the mvneta isn't resumed, this is not safe.

> 
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
> > +		struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
> > +
> > +		mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
> > +	}  
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to have
> mvneta_rxq_sw_deinit/mvneta_rxq_hw_deinit(), like you did for the
> initialization ?

For rxq deinit, we'd like to drop rx pkts, this is both HW and SW operation.
So we reuse mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts() here.

> 
> > +
> > +	for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
> > +		struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
> > +
> > +		/* Set minimum bandwidth for disabled TXQs */
> > +		mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_CFG_REG(txq->id), 0);
> > +		mvreg_write(pp, MVETH_TXQ_TOKEN_COUNT_REG(txq->id), 0);
> > +
> > +		/* Set Tx descriptors queue starting address and size */
> > +		mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_BASE_ADDR_REG(txq->id), 0);
> > +		mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_SIZE_REG(txq->id), 0);
> > +	}  
> 
> Same comment here: a mvneta_txq_sw_deinit()/mvneta_txq_hw_deinit()
> would be good, and would avoid duplicating this logic.

yep, will do in v2.

Thanks a lot for the kind review.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:15:47 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> > > +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
> > > +						    &pp->node_online);
> > > +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
> > > +						    &pp->node_dead);    
> > 
> > Do we need to remove/add those CPU notifiers when suspending/resuming ?  
> 
> Take mvneta_cpu_online() as an example, if we don't remove it during
> suspend, when system is resume back, it will touch mac when secondary
> cpu is ON, but at this point the mvneta isn't resumed, this is not safe.

Hm. I'm still a bit confused by this new CPU hotplug API. I understand
the issue you have and indeed unregistering the CPU hotplug callbacks
is a way to solve the problem, but I find it weird that we have to do
this.

Anyway, it's OK to do it, because it's anyway what was done so far. It
is just annoying that there is a duplication of the logic between
mvneta_suspend() and mvneta_stop() on one side, and duplication between
mvneta_resume() and mvnete_start() on the other side.

> > > +	for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
> > > +		struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
> > > +
> > > +		mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
> > > +	}    
> > 
> > Wouldn't it make sense to have
> > mvneta_rxq_sw_deinit/mvneta_rxq_hw_deinit(), like you did for the
> > initialization ?  
> 
> For rxq deinit, we'd like to drop rx pkts, this is both HW and SW operation.
> So we reuse mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts() here.

Hum, OK, indeed. It would have been nicer to have something symmetric,
with the hw/sw parts split in a similar way for the init and deinit of
both txqs and rxqs, but I agree that dropping the RX packets before
going into suspend involves both HW and SW operations.

Thanks!

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com