From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/47] Netfilter/IPVS updates for net-next Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:43:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180330.114333.26040889472683940.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180330113729.18335-1-pablo@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:60542 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbeC3Png (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:43:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180330113729.18335-1-pablo@netfilter.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:36:42 +0200 > The following patchset contains Netfilter/IPVS updates for your net-next > tree. This batch comes with more input sanitization for xtables to > address bug reports from fuzzers, preparation works to the flowtable > infrastructure and assorted updates. In no particular order, they are: Pulled, but I have to ask you not to handle things this way next time. The other week when I pushed back on your pull request, I asked for some explanations about the flow table situation. When I was satisfied with the explanation I explicitly asked you to resend _exactly_ the original pull request. I asked you to do this because I didn't want to see a huge pull request like this one show up later. And this is exactly what happend. :-/ Please, next time I ask you to resend a pull request I have a very good reason for doing so, so please do it. Thanks.