From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:04:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180330170413.73320f7f@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180329134259.3fe6165b@windsurf>
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:42:59 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:13:56 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > This is to prepare the suspend/resume improvement in next patch. The
> > SW parts can be optimized out during resume.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
>
> Thanks, I have two very minor nits below, but otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Thanks for reviewing.
>
> > +/* Create a specified RX queue */
> > +static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > + struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> > +
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = mvneta_rxq_sw_init(pp, rxq);
> > + if (ret)
>
> Here you're testing if (ret), while in mvneta_txq_init(), in the same
> situation, you're doing if (ret < 0). I don't have a preference for one
> or the other, but having them consistent between the two lpaces would
> be nice.
updated in v2.
>
> > -/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
> > -static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > - struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > +static int mvneta_txq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > + struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > {
> > int cpu;
> >
> > @@ -2872,7 +2889,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > txq->tx_stop_threshold = txq->size - MVNETA_MAX_SKB_DESCS;
> > txq->tx_wake_threshold = txq->tx_stop_threshold / 2;
> >
> > -
>
> Spurious change.
There's an extra blank line here, so I removed it ;)
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-30 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 10:12 [PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 10:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 11:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-30 9:04 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-03-29 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 11:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-30 9:15 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-30 9:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180330170413.73320f7f@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).