From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kbuild test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 07/10] bpf: btf: Add pretty print support to the basic arraymap Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:12:36 +0800 Message-ID: <201803311609.tsZ62eCl%fengguang.wu@intel.com> References: <20180330182643.3539371-8-kafai@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , kernel-team@fb.com To: Martin KaFai Lau Return-path: Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:5669 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564AbeCaJMw (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2018 05:12:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180330182643.3539371-8-kafai@fb.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Martin, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Martin-KaFai-Lau/BTF-BPF-Type-Format/20180331-144656 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master reproduce: # apt-get install sparse make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> kernel/bpf/inode.c:195:6: sparse: symbol 'map_seq_next' was not declared. Should it be static? >> kernel/bpf/inode.c:282:30: sparse: symbol 'bpffs_map_fops' was not declared. Should it be static? Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation