From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next V9 PATCH 00/16] XDP redirect memory return API Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:23:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180403.122338.1130037886539379926.davem@davemloft.net> References: <152275360298.1026.10333759008401281682.stgit@firesoul> <20180403.105427.1908874085989267860.davem@davemloft.net> <20180403180716.66c3daee@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.topel@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, eugenia@mellanox.com, jasowang@redhat.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, eranbe@mellanox.com, saeedm@mellanox.com, galp@mellanox.com, borkmann@iogearbox.net, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, tariqt@mellanox.com To: brouer@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:53956 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164AbeDCQXn (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:23:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180403180716.66c3daee@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:07:16 +0200 > On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:54:27 -0400 (EDT) > David Miller wrote: > >> Don't worry, just resubmit when net-next opens back up. > > At that point in time, should I got back to posting it against the > bpf-next git-tree again? Any preferences from Mellanox or BPF-guys? I have no personal preference, although it's probably best to go through the bpf-next tree. > ... It have been a bit of a pain to keep track of driver changes in > net-next, and waiting for them to get merged into bpf-next. I totally understand :)