From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:32:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180408.123207.2294740686493951200.davem@davemloft.net> References: <54accf73-e6cc-e03f-6a1c-34e1bbd78047@gmail.com> <20180404.133749.1802514210170809419.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dsahern@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, si-wei.liu@oracle.com, mst@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, kubakici@wp.pl, jasowang@redhat.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org To: loseweigh@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:51668 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756AbeDHQcJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Apr 2018 12:32:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Siwei Liu Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special attributes, mark them as such and the tools base their actions upon that. "Hiding", or changing classes, doesn't make any sense to me still.