From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/6] bnxt_en: do not allow wildcard matches for L2 flows Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:43:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20180411114303.6f927c45@cakuba.netronome.com> References: <1523461818-15774-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> <1523461818-15774-3-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Chan , Andy Gospodarek Return-path: Received: from mx3.wp.pl ([212.77.101.10]:56709 "EHLO mx3.wp.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755292AbeDKSnZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:43:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1523461818-15774-3-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:50:14 -0400, Michael Chan wrote: > @@ -764,6 +788,41 @@ static bool bnxt_tc_can_offload(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_tc_flow *flow) > return false; > } > > + /* Currently source/dest MAC cannot be partial wildcard */ > + if (bits_set(&flow->l2_key.smac, sizeof(flow->l2_key.smac)) && > + !is_exactmatch(flow->l2_mask.smac, sizeof(flow->l2_mask.smac))) { > + netdev_info(bp->dev, "Wildcard match unsupported for Source MAC\n"); This wouldn't be something to do in net, but how do you feel about using extack for messages like this? > + return false; > + }