From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
avagin@virtuozzo.com, serge@hallyn.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netns: filter uevents correctly
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 21:57:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411195742.GA640@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871sflk0zc.fsf@xmission.com>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:16:23PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:37:18PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:40:14AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> >> Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com> writes:
> >> >> > Yeah, agreed.
> >> >> > But I think the patch is not complete. To guarantee that no non-initial
> >> >> > user namespace actually receives uevents we need to:
> >> >> > 1. only sent uevents to uevent sockets that are located in network
> >> >> > namespaces that are owned by init_user_ns
> >> >> > 2. filter uevents that are sent to sockets in mc_list that have opened a
> >> >> > uevent socket that is owned by init_user_ns *from* a
> >> >> > non-init_user_ns
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We account for 1. by only recording uevent sockets in the global uevent
> >> >> > socket list who are owned by init_user_ns.
> >> >> > But to account for 2. we need to filter by the user namespace who owns
> >> >> > the socket in mc_list. So in addition to that we also need to slightly
> >> >> > change the filter logic in kobj_bcast_filter() I think:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
> >> >> > index 22a2c1a98b8f..064d7d29ace5 100644
> >> >> > --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c
> >> >> > +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
> >> >> > @@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ static int kobj_bcast_filter(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
> >> >> > return sock_ns != ns;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > - return 0;
> >> >> > + /* Check if socket was opened from non-initial user namespace. */
> >> >> > + return sk_user_ns(dsk) != &init_user_ns;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > #endif
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > But correct me if I'm wrong.
> >> >>
> >> >> You are worrying about NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID sockets. That has
> >> >> permissions and an explicit opt-in to receiving packets from multiple
> >> >> network namespaces.
> >> >
> >> > I don't think that's what I'm talking about unless that is somehow the
> >> > default for NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT sockets. What I'm worried about is
> >> > doing
> >> >
> >> > unshare -U --map-root
> >> >
> >> > then opening a NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT socket and starting to listen to
> >> > uevents. Imho, this should not be possible because I'm in a
> >> > non-init_user_ns. But currently I'm able to - even with the patch to
> >> > come - since the uevent socket in the kernel was created when init_net
> >> > was created and hence is *owned* by the init_user_ns which means it is
> >> > in the list of uevent sockets. Here's a demo of what I mean:
> >> >
> >> > https://asciinema.org/a/175632
> >>
> >> Why do you care about this case?
> >
> > It's not so much that I care about this case since any workload that
> > wants to run a separate udevd will have to unshare the network namespace
> > and the user namespace for it to make complete sense.
> > What I do care about is that the two of us are absolutely in the clear
> > about what semantics we are going to expose to userspace and it seems
> > that we were talking past each other wrt to this "corner case".
> > For userspace, it needs to be very clear that the intention is to filter
> > by *owning user namespace of the network namespace a given task resides
> > in* and not by user namespace of the task per se. This is what this
> > corner case basically shows, I think.
>
> If this is just a clarification of semantics then yes this is a
> productive question. I almost agree with your definition above.
>
> I would make the definition very simple. Uevents will not be broadcast
> via netlink in a network namespace where net->user_ns != &init_user_ns,
> with the exception of uevents for network devices in that network
> namespace.
Well, for the sake of posterity :) I should add that I'd prefer we'd add
what I suggested above:
- return 0;
+ /* Check if socket was opened from non-initial user namespace. */
+ return sk_user_ns(dsk) != &init_user_ns;
}
to slam the door shut once and for all for all non-init_user_ns
namespaces because it *seems* like the cleanest solution: uevents are
owned by init_user_ns; period. Because it is the only user namespace
that can do anything interesting with them *by default*.
But what we have now right now with my upcoming patch is at least
sufficient and safe.
Christian
>
> The existing filtering by the sending uid and verifying that it is uid 0
> gives a little more room to filter if we want (as udev & friends will
> ignore the uevent), but I don't see the point.
>
> Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-04 19:48 [PATCH net-next] netns: filter uevents correctly Christian Brauner
2018-04-04 20:30 ` [PATCH net] " Christian Brauner
2018-04-04 22:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-05 1:35 ` Christian Brauner
[not found] ` <CAPP7u0VQc33MiYP8Ene6K1Bqkx4LtBtQ0ugFYp_36UsxuusT1g@mail.gmail.com>
2018-04-06 2:02 ` David Miller
2018-04-05 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next] " Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-05 14:07 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-05 14:26 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-05 14:41 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-06 3:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-06 13:07 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-06 14:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-06 16:07 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-06 16:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-09 15:46 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-09 23:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-10 14:35 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-10 15:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-11 9:09 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-11 16:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-11 17:03 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-11 18:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-11 18:57 ` Christian Brauner
2018-04-11 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-11 19:57 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180411195742.GA640@gmail.com \
--to=christian.brauner@canonical.com \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).