From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] PCI: Add pcie_print_link_status() to log link speed and whether it's limited Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:32:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20180412213249.06661048@cakuba.netronome.com> References: <152244269202.135666.3064353823697623332.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <152244391852.135666.14903825998610307052.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tal Gilboa , Tariq Toukan , Jacob Keller , Ariel Elior , Ganesh Goudar , Jeff Kirsher , everest-linux-l2@cavium.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Return-path: In-Reply-To: <152244391852.135666.14903825998610307052.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:05:18 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > + if (bw_avail >= bw_cap) > + pci_info(dev, "%d Mb/s available bandwidth (%s x%d link)\n", > + bw_cap, PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed_cap), width_cap); > + else > + pci_info(dev, "%d Mb/s available bandwidth, limited by %s x%d link at %s (capable of %d Mb/s with %s x%d link)\n", > + bw_avail, PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed), width, > + limiting_dev ? pci_name(limiting_dev) : "", > + bw_cap, PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed_cap), width_cap); I was just looking at using this new function to print PCIe BW for a NIC, but I'm slightly worried that there is nothing in the message that says PCIe... For a NIC some people may interpret the bandwidth as NIC bandwidth: [ 39.839989] nfp 0000:04:00.0: Netronome Flow Processor NFP4000/NFP6000 PCIe Card Probe [ 39.848943] nfp 0000:04:00.0: 63.008 Gb/s available bandwidth (8 GT/s x8 link) [ 39.857146] nfp 0000:04:00.0: RESERVED BARs: 0.0: General/MSI-X SRAM, 0.1: PCIe XPB/MSI-X PBA, 0.4: Explicit0, 0.5: Explicit1, fre4 It's not a 63Gbps NIC... I'm sorry if this was discussed before and I didn't find it. Would it make sense to add the "PCIe: " prefix to the message like bnx2x used to do? Like: nfp 0000:04:00.0: PCIe: 63.008 Gb/s available bandwidth (8 GT/s x8 link) Sorry for a very late comment.