public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	jfreimann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:22:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180414112211.pf6on4mzewb2d56c@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180413181808-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:22:45PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:12:16PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > +static inline bool more_used(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	return vq->packed ? more_used_packed(vq) : more_used_split(vq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned int *len,
> > +				  void **ctx)
> > +{
> > +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +	void *ret;
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +	u16 last_used;
> > +
> > +	START_USE(vq);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > +		END_USE(vq);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!more_used(vq)) {
> > +		pr_debug("No more buffers in queue\n");
> > +		END_USE(vq);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> 
> So virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split should only call more_used_split.

Yeah, you're right! Will fix this in the next version.

> 
> to avoid such issues I think we should lay out the code like this:
> 
> XXX_split
> 
> XXX_packed
> 
> XXX wrappers

I'll do it. Thanks for the suggestion!

> 
> > +/* The standard layout
> 
> I'd drop standard here.

Got it. I'll drop the word "standard".

> 
> > for the packed ring is a continuous chunk of memory
> > + * which looks like this.
> > + *
> > + * struct vring_packed
> > + * {
> 
> Can the opening bracket go on the prev line pls?

Sure.

> 
> > + *	// The actual descriptors (16 bytes each)
> > + *	struct vring_packed_desc desc[num];
> > + *
> > + *	// Padding to the next align boundary.
> > + *	char pad[];
> > + *
> > + *	// Driver Event Suppression
> > + *	struct vring_packed_desc_event driver;
> > + *
> > + *	// Device Event Suppression
> > + *	struct vring_packed_desc_event device;
> 
> Maybe that's how our driver does it but it's not based on spec
> so I don't think this belongs in the header.

I will move it to the place where vring_packed_init()
is defined.

> 
> > + * };
> > + */
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned vring_packed_size(unsigned int num, unsigned long align)
> > +{
> > +	return ((sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) * num + align - 1)
> > +		& ~(align - 1)) + sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc_event) * 2;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Cant say this API makes sense for me.

Hmm, do you have any suggestion? Also move it out of this header?

Thanks for the review! :)

Best regards,
Tiwei Bie

> 
> 
> >  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_RING_H */
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-14 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-01 14:12 [RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring Tiwei Bie
2018-04-10  2:55 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-10  3:21   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-13  4:30 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-13  7:15   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-17  2:11     ` Jason Wang
2018-04-17  2:17       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-17  2:24         ` Jason Wang
2018-04-17  2:37           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-17  2:51       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-17 12:17         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-17 12:47           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-17 14:04             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-17 14:56               ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-17 15:54                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-18  1:17                   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-13 15:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-14 11:22   ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2018-04-23  5:42 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23  9:29   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-24  0:54     ` Jason Wang
2018-04-24  1:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24  1:14         ` Jason Wang
2018-04-24  1:16         ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-24  1:29           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24  1:37             ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-24  1:43               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24  1:49                 ` Tiwei Bie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180414112211.pf6on4mzewb2d56c@debian \
    --to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wexu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox