From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: linux-next on x60: network manager often complains "network is disabled" after resume Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 18:15:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20180415161551.GF10802@amd> References: <20180318104023.GA10392@amd> <70721f83-344a-0f23-223b-9c81f6e9e32a@gmail.com> <20180319092106.GA5683@amd> <6e43123a-5227-96c4-a1f5-4416bdb5b0db@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l+goss899txtYvYf" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list , Netdev list To: Woody Suwalski Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue 2018-03-20 21:11:54, Woody Suwalski wrote: > Woody Suwalski wrote: > >Pavel Machek wrote: > >>On Mon 2018-03-19 05:17:45, Woody Suwalski wrote: > >>>Pavel Machek wrote: > >>>>Hi! > >>>> > >>>>With recent linux-next, after resume networkmanager often claims that > >>>>"network is disabled". Sometimes suspend/resume clears that. > >>>> > >>>>Any ideas? Does it work for you? > >>>>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Pavel > >>>Tried the 4.16-rc6 with nm 1.4.4 - I do not see the issue. > >>Thanks for testing... but yes, 4.16 should be ok. If not fixed, > >>problem will appear in 4.17-rc1. > >> > >Works here OK. Tried ~10 suspends, all restarted OK. > >kernel next-20180320 > >nmcli shows that Wifi always connects OK > > > >Woody > > > Contrary, it just happened to me on a 64-bit build 4.16-rc5 on T440. > I think that Dan's suspicion is correct - it is a snafu in the PM: trying= to > hibernate results in a message: > Failed to hibernate system via logind: There's already a shutdown or sleep > operation in progress. >=20 > And ps shows "Ds /lib/systemd/systemd-sleep suspend"... Problem now seems to be in the mainline. But no, I don't see systemd-sleep in my process list :-(. I guess you can't reproduce it easily? I tried bisecting, but while it happens often enough to make v4.17 hard to use, it does not permit reliable bisect. These should be bad according to my notes b04240a33b99b32cf6fbdf5c943c04e505a0cb07=20 ed80dc19e4dd395c951f745acd1484d61c4cfb20 52113a0d3889d6e2738cf09bf79bc9cac7b5e1c6 4fc97ef94bbfa185d16b3e44199b7559d0668747 14ebdb2c814f508936fe178a2abc906a16a3ab48 639adbeef5ae1bb8eeebbb0cde0b885397bde192 bisection claimed c16add24522547bf52c189b3c0d1ab6f5c2b4375 is first bad commit, but I'm not sure if I trust that. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlrTercACgkQMOfwapXb+vKx9ACgiDP2CHhqiPMvrneTl75lVeoJ xQ8AnidZqh2Z02oIM6FKUUY/RCiK18wp =uP0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l+goss899txtYvYf--