From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"William Tu" <u9012063@gmail.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: XDP performance regression due to CONFIG_RETPOLINE Spectre V2
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:15:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417061550.GA21067@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180416230704.65629b9f@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:07:04PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On X86 swiotlb fallback (via get_dma_ops -> get_arch_dma_ops) to use
> x86_swiotlb_dma_ops, instead of swiotlb_dma_ops. I also included that
> in below fix patch.
x86_swiotlb_dma_ops should not exist any mor, and x86 now uses
dma_direct_ops. Looks like you are applying it to an old kernel :)
> Performance improved to 8.9 Mpps from approx 6.5Mpps.
>
> (This was without my bulking for net_device->ndo_xdp_xmit, so that
> number should improve more).
What is the number for the otherwise comparable setup without repolines?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 13:50 XDP performance regression due to CONFIG_RETPOLINE Spectre V2 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-04-12 14:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-12 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-12 15:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-04-13 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-13 17:12 ` Tushar Dave
2018-04-13 17:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-14 19:29 ` David Woodhouse
2018-04-16 6:02 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-04-16 12:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-16 16:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-04-17 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-16 18:05 ` dma-mapping: bypass dma_ops for direct mappings kbuild test robot
2018-04-16 18:26 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-04-16 18:31 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-16 21:07 ` XDP performance regression due to CONFIG_RETPOLINE Spectre V2 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-04-17 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-04-17 7:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-04-17 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180417061550.GA21067@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u9012063@gmail.com \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).