netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:48:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417204829.GK7632@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-+XC-KNYe136k-mYfOCEcP_1rORwYkFbZ1mVdH_q=bY7Q@mail.gmail.com>

On (04/17/18 16:23), Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> 
> Assuming IPv4 with an MTU of 1500 and the maximum segment
> size of 1472, the receiver will see three datagrams with MSS of
> 1472B, 528B and 512B.

so the recvmsg will also pass up 1472, 526, 512, right?
If yes, how will the recvmsg differentiate between the case
(2000 byte message followed by 512 byte message) and
(1472 byte message, 526 byte message, then 512 byte message),
in other words, how are UDP message boundary semantics preserved?

--Sowmini

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-17 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-17 20:00 [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 01/11] udp: expose inet cork to udp Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 02/11] udp: add gso Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 03/11] udp: better wmem accounting on gso Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 04/11] udp: paged allocation with gso Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 05/11] udp: add gso segment cmsg Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 06/11] udp: add gso support to virtual devices Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18  0:43   ` Dimitris Michailidis
2018-04-18  3:27     ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 07/11] udp: zerocopy Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 08/11] selftests: udp gso Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:00 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 09/11] selftests: udp gso with connected sockets Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso Sowmini Varadhan
2018-04-17 20:23   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-17 20:48     ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2018-04-17 21:07       ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18  2:25         ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18  3:33           ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18 12:31             ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-04-18 13:35               ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-18 13:47                 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-04-18 13:51                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18 15:08                     ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2018-04-18 17:40                     ` David Miller
2018-04-18 17:34                   ` David Miller
2018-04-18 13:59               ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18 14:28                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18 17:28               ` David Miller
2018-04-18 18:12                 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-04-18 18:22                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-20 17:38                     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-04-20 21:58                       ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-21  2:08                         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-04-18 19:33                   ` David Miller
2018-04-20 18:27                   ` Tushar Dave
2018-04-20 20:08                     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-04-21  3:11                       ` Tushar Dave
2018-08-31  9:09         ` Paolo Abeni
2018-08-31 10:09           ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-31 13:08           ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-08-31 13:44             ` Paolo Abeni
2018-08-31 15:11               ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-09-03  8:02             ` Steffen Klassert
2018-09-03 11:45               ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-04-18 11:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-04-18 13:49   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-24  0:02     ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-05-24  1:15       ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-18 17:24   ` David Miller
2018-04-18 17:50 ` David Miller
2018-04-18 18:12   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-19 17:45     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180417204829.GK7632@oracle.com \
    --to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).