From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:33:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20180418.153318.51295736872496660.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180418123103.GC19633@oracle.com>
        <20180418.132808.1710130437020293308.davem@davemloft.net>
        <CAKgT0UcefCpG2j7RQN8aUUgu2bud_RTFs_s+nFPY2GhKgE8L+A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
        sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        willemb@google.com
To: alexander.duyck@gmail.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:47388 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750824AbeDRTdW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:33:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UcefCpG2j7RQN8aUUgu2bud_RTFs_s+nFPY2GhKgE8L+A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:12:06 -0700

> My only concern with the patch set is verifying what mitigations are
> in case so that we aren't trying to set an MSS size that results in a
> frame larger than MTU. I'm still digging through the code and trying
> to grok it, but I figured I might just put the question out there to
> may my reviewing easier.

It signals an error if a too large segment size is requested.