From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?562U5aSNOg==?= [PATCH][net-next] net: ip tos cgroup
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20180419.112740.414437419078279622.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1523936161-11676-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>
        <e5915527-5846-dce5-18de-5aee977c2e4b@iogearbox.net>
        <2AD939572F25A448A3AE3CAEA61328C2375E35F6@BC-MAIL-M28.internal.baidu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
        ast@fb.com, brakmo@fb.com
To: lirongqing@baidu.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:59340 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751228AbeDSP1o (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:27:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2AD939572F25A448A3AE3CAEA61328C2375E35F6@BC-MAIL-M28.internal.baidu.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 04:56:09 +0000

> I think this method is easier to use than BPF, and more efficient

Ease of use is arguable, but for anything bpf this is going to
steadily improve over time therefore it is not much of an argument
against using bpf.

And I disagree on the efficient aspect as well.