From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
raspl@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/smc: fix structure size
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:56:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180419135655.3058-2-ubraun@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419135655.3058-1-ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The struct smc_cdc_msg must be defined as packed so the
size is 44 bytes.
And change the structure size check so sizeof is checked.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_cdc.c | 2 +-
net/smc/smc_cdc.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
index b42395d24cba..42ad57365eca 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static inline void smc_cdc_add_pending_send(struct smc_connection *conn,
sizeof(struct smc_cdc_msg) > SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE,
"must increase SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE to at least sizeof(struct smc_cdc_msg)");
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(
- offsetof(struct smc_cdc_msg, reserved) > SMC_WR_TX_SIZE,
+ sizeof(struct smc_cdc_msg) != SMC_WR_TX_SIZE,
"must adapt SMC_WR_TX_SIZE to sizeof(struct smc_cdc_msg); if not all smc_wr upper layer protocols use the same message size any more, must start to set link->wr_tx_sges[i].length on each individual smc_wr_tx_send()");
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(
sizeof(struct smc_cdc_tx_pend) > SMC_WR_TX_PEND_PRIV_SIZE,
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
index ab240b37ad11..d2012fd22100 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct smc_cdc_msg {
struct smc_cdc_producer_flags prod_flags;
struct smc_cdc_conn_state_flags conn_state_flags;
u8 reserved[18];
-} __aligned(8);
+} __packed; /* format defined in RFC7609 */
static inline bool smc_cdc_rxed_any_close(struct smc_connection *conn)
{
--
2.13.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 13:56 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net/smc: fixes from 2018-05-17 - v2 Ursula Braun
2018-04-19 13:56 ` Ursula Braun [this message]
2018-04-19 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net/smc: handle sockopt TCP_NODELAY Ursula Braun
2018-04-20 15:31 ` David Miller
2018-04-19 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net/smc: handle sockopt TCP_CORK Ursula Braun
2018-04-19 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net/smc: handle sockopt TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT Ursula Braun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180419135655.3058-2-ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raspl@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).