From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: add TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE support for
 zerocopy receive
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:28:59 -0700
Message-ID: <20180425062859.GA23914@infradead.org>
References: <20180425052722.73022-1-edumazet@google.com>
 <20180425052722.73022-2-edumazet@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180425052722.73022-2-edumazet@google.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:27:21PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> When adding tcp mmap() implementation, I forgot that socket lock
> had to be taken before current->mm->mmap_sem. syzbot eventually caught
> the bug.
> 
> Since we can not lock the socket in tcp mmap() handler we have to
> split the operation in two phases.
> 
> 1) mmap() on a tcp socket simply reserves VMA space, and nothing else.
>   This operation does not involve any TCP locking.
> 
> 2) setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE, ...) implements
>  the transfert of pages from skbs to one VMA.
>   This operation only uses down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem) after
>   holding TCP lock, thus solving the lockdep issue.
> 
> This new implementation was suggested by Andy Lutomirski with great details.

Thanks, this looks much more sensible to me.