From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Brivio Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 ipsec-next] xfrm: remove VLA usage in __xfrm6_sort() Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:58:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20180425165852.6c7460c2@epycfail> References: <20180425144639.GA38350@beast> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Christoforou , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Kees Cook Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180425144639.GA38350@beast> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:46:39 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage removed from the kernel[1], > just use XFRM_MAX_DEPTH as already done for the "class" array. In one > case, it'll do this loop up to 5, the other caller up to 6. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621 > > Co-developed-by: Andreas Christoforou > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > --- > v4: > - actually remove memset(). :) > v3: > - adjust Subject and commit log (Steffen) > - use "= { }" instead of memset() (Stefano) > v2: > - use XFRM_MAX_DEPTH for "count" array (Steffen and Mathias). > --- Acked-by: Stefano Brivio