From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <ast@fb.com>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/10] bpf: remove never-hit branches in verifier adjust_scalar_min_max_vals
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:29:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425192910.556352-5-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425192910.556352-1-yhs@fb.com>
In verifier function adjust_scalar_min_max_vals,
when src_known is false and the opcode is BPF_LSH/BPF_RSH,
early return will happen in the function. So remove
the branch in handling BPF_LSH/BPF_RSH when src_known is false.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 988400e..6e3f859 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2940,10 +2940,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
dst_reg->umin_value <<= umin_val;
dst_reg->umax_value <<= umax_val;
}
- if (src_known)
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
- else
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
__update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
break;
@@ -2971,11 +2968,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*/
dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
- if (src_known)
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off,
- umin_val);
- else
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
dst_reg->umin_value >>= umax_val;
dst_reg->umax_value >>= umin_val;
/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 19:29 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/10] bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/10] bpf: change prototype for stack_map_get_build_id_offset Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/10] bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/10] bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for " Yonghong Song
2018-04-27 23:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-04-25 19:29 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2018-04-27 23:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/10] bpf: remove never-hit branches in verifier adjust_scalar_min_max_vals Alexei Starovoitov
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/10] bpf/verifier: improve register value range tracking with ARSH Yonghong Song
2018-04-27 23:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-04-28 5:23 ` Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/10] tools/bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper to tools headers Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/10] samples/bpf: move common-purpose trace functions to selftests Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/10] tools/bpf: add a verifier test case for bpf_get_stack helper and ARSH Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/10] tools/bpf: add a test for bpf_get_stack with raw tracepoint prog Yonghong Song
2018-04-25 19:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/10] tools/bpf: add a test for bpf_get_stack with " Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180425192910.556352-5-yhs@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).