From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
davem@davemloft.net, jiri@mellanox.com, petrm@mellanox.com,
mlxsw@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] mlxsw: spectrum_span: Allow bridge for gretap mirror
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:58:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426085833.2fbcd276@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e3e120f-821a-2d99-b720-0585ce9c1803@cumulusnetworks.com>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:50:12 +0300
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> On 26/04/18 12:06, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > From: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
> >
> > When handling mirroring to a gretap or ip6gretap netdevice in mlxsw, the
> > underlay address (i.e. the remote address of the tunnel) may be routed
> > to a bridge.
> >
> > In that case, look up the resolved neighbor Ethernet address in that
> > bridge's FDB. Then configure the offload to direct the mirrored traffic
> > to that port, possibly with tagging.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_span.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_span.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_span.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_span.c
> > index 65a77708ff61..92fb81839852 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_span.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_span.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> > */
> >
> > +#include <linux/if_bridge.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <net/arp.h>
> > #include <net/gre.h>
> > @@ -39,8 +40,9 @@
> > #include <net/ip6_tunnel.h>
> >
> > #include "spectrum.h"
> > -#include "spectrum_span.h"
> > #include "spectrum_ipip.h"
> > +#include "spectrum_span.h"
> > +#include "spectrum_switchdev.h"
> >
> > int mlxsw_sp_span_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
> > {
> > @@ -167,6 +169,79 @@ mlxsw_sp_span_entry_unoffloadable(struct mlxsw_sp_span_parms *sparmsp)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct net_device *
> > +mlxsw_sp_span_entry_bridge_8021q(const struct net_device *br_dev,
> > + unsigned char *dmac,
> > + u16 *p_vid)
> > +{
> > + struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg = br_vlan_group_rtnl(br_dev);
> > + u16 pvid = br_vlan_group_pvid(vg);
> > + struct net_device *edev = NULL;
> > + struct net_bridge_vlan *v;
> > +
>
> Hi,
> These structures are not really exported anywhere outside of br_private.h
> Instead of passing them around and risking someone else actually trying to
> dereference an incomplete type, why don't you add just 2 new helpers -
> br_vlan_pvid(netdevice) and br_vlan_info(netdevice, vid, *bridge_vlan_info)
>
> br_vlan_info can return the exported and already available type "bridge_vlan_info"
> (defined in uapi/linux/if_bridge.h) into the bridge_vlan_info arg
> and br_vlan_pvid is obvious - return the current dev pvid if available.
>
> Another bonus you'll avoid dealing with the bridge's vlan internals.
I am particularly worried that any locking changes will impact the device
driver. Also lock inversion issues, and implied (or not RTNL).
Also what if a value is changed, there is no notification path back to the device.
Having an API that only takes net_device and vlan seems preferable.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 9:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] mlxsw: SPAN: Support routes pointing at bridges Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: bridge: Publish bridge accessor functions Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] mlxsw: spectrum: Extract mlxsw_sp_stp_spms_state() Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Publish two functions Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] mlxsw: spectrum: Register SPAN before switchdev Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] mlxsw: Respin SPAN on switchdev events Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 9:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] mlxsw: spectrum_span: Allow bridge for gretap mirror Ido Schimmel
2018-04-26 10:50 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2018-04-26 13:03 ` Petr Machata
2018-04-26 15:58 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180426085833.2fbcd276@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=petrm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).