From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: btf: remove a couple conditions Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:39:59 +0300 Message-ID: <20180427193959.3nebosalgl3ch4mv@mwanda> References: <20180427140459.GB19583@mwanda> <20180427172023.6japncdd3nbqauzn@kafai-mbp> <20180427175544.vydqf4iufopcyv6d@kafai-mbp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: Martin KaFai Lau Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180427175544.vydqf4iufopcyv6d@kafai-mbp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55:46AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:04:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > We know "err" is zero so we can remove these and pull the code in one > > > indent level. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > Thanks for the simplification! > > > > Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau > btw, it should be for bpf-next. Please tag the subject with bpf-next when > you respin. Thanks! > I'm working against linux-next. For networking, I have a separate tree which I use to figure out if it's in net or net-next. It's kind of a headache (but obviously networking is the largest subtree so it's required). Is there an automated way to tie a Fixes tag from linux-next to a subtree? regards, dan carpenter