netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: soheil.kdev@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ycheng@google.com, ncardwell@google.com,
	edumazet@google.com, willemb@google.com, soheil@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 1/2] tcp: send in-queue bytes in cmsg upon read
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:38:34 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180430.113834.1760530542793231849.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180427185733.36855-1-soheil.kdev@gmail.com>

From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.kdev@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:57:32 -0400

> Since the socket lock is not held when calculating the size of
> receive queue, TCP_INQ is a hint.  For example, it can overestimate
> the queue size by one byte, if FIN is received.

I think it is even worse than that.

If another application comes in and does a recvmsg() in parallel with
these calculations, you could even report a negative value.

These READ_ONCE() make it look like some of these issues are being
addressed but they are not.

You could freeze the values just by taking sk->sk_lock.slock, but I
don't know if that cost is considered acceptable or not.

Another idea is to sample both values in a loop, similar to a sequence
lock sequence:

again:
	tmp1 = A;
	tmp2 = B;
	barrier();
	tmp3 = A;
	if (tmp1 != tmp3)
		goto again;

But the current state of affairs is not going to work well.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-30 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-27 18:57 [PATCH V2 net-next 1/2] tcp: send in-queue bytes in cmsg upon read Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2018-04-27 18:57 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 2/2] selftest: add test for TCP_INQ Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2018-04-30 15:38 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-04-30 15:43   ` [PATCH V2 net-next 1/2] tcp: send in-queue bytes in cmsg upon read Eric Dumazet
2018-04-30 15:56     ` David Miller
2018-04-30 16:01       ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-30 16:10         ` David Miller
2018-04-30 16:59           ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2018-04-30 15:59     ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180430.113834.1760530542793231849.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).