From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: Allow non-gateway ECMP for IPv6 Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 14:23:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180501.142344.24284993960758641.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180430211529.8295-1-Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:48564 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755539AbeEASXq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2018 14:23:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180430211529.8295-1-Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Thomas Winter Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 09:15:29 +1200 > It is valid to have static routes where the nexthop > is an interface not an address such as tunnels. > For IPv4 it was possible to use ECMP on these routes > but not for IPv6. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Winter Applied, thank you.