From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: enable stackmap with build_id in nmi context
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 11:21:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180502092109.GI12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502000220.2585320-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:02:19PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> @@ -267,17 +285,27 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
> {
> int i;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + bool in_nmi_ctx = in_nmi();
> + bool irq_work_busy = false;
> + struct stack_map_irq_work *work;
> +
> + if (in_nmi_ctx) {
> + work = this_cpu_ptr(&irq_work);
> + if (work->sem)
> + /* cannot queue more up_read, fallback */
> + irq_work_busy = true;
> + }
>
> /*
> + * We cannot do up_read() in nmi context. To do build_id lookup
> + * in nmi context, we need to run up_read() in irq_work. We use
> + * a percpu variable to do the irq_work. If the irq_work is
> + * already used by another lookup, we fall back to report ips.
> *
> * Same fallback is used for kernel stack (!user) on a stackmap
> * with build_id.
> */
> + if (!user || !current || !current->mm || irq_work_busy ||
> down_read_trylock(¤t->mm->mmap_sem) == 0) {
> /* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */
> for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
> @@ -299,7 +327,13 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
> - vma->vm_start;
> id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID;
> }
> +
> + if (!in_nmi_ctx)
> + up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> + else {
> + work->sem = ¤t->mm->mmap_sem;
> + irq_work_queue(&work->work);
> + }
> }
This is disguisting.. :-)
It's broken though, I've bet you've never actually ran this with lockdep
enabled for example.
Also, you set work->sem before you do trylock, if the trylock fails you
return early and keep work->sem set, which will thereafter always result
in irq_work_busy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-02 0:02 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: enable stackmap with build_id in nmi context Song Liu
2018-05-02 0:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: add selftest for stackmap with build_id in NMI context Song Liu
2018-05-02 3:34 ` [RFC PATCH] bpf: __pcpu_scope_irq_work can be static kbuild test robot
2018-05-02 3:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: enable stackmap with build_id in nmi context kbuild test robot
2018-05-02 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-02 16:48 ` Song Liu
2018-05-02 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 17:57 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180502092109.GI12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox