From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip6_gre: correct the function name in ip6gre_tnl_addr_conflict() comment Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 11:29:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180503.112917.1826139698591913188.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180503013429.4330-1-sunlw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: sunlw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:48386 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954AbeECP3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2018 11:29:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180503013429.4330-1-sunlw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Sun Lianwen Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 09:34:29 +0800 > The function name is wrong in ip6gre_tnl_addr_conflict() comment, which > use ip6_tnl_addr_conflict instead of ip6gre_tnl_addr_conflict. > > Signed-off-by: Sun Lianwen Applied.