From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/15] ARM: sun8i: r40: Add Ethernet support Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 15:12:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20180503131257.rlqxetafejikmnji@flea> References: <20180501161227.2110-1-wens@csie.org> <20180502.110617.304411895589508709.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z2nmrjqmglrtqum5" Cc: wens@csie.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, icenowy@aosc.io To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:53188 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922AbeECNNJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2018 09:13:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180502.110617.304411895589508709.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --z2nmrjqmglrtqum5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:06:17AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Chen-Yu Tsai > Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 00:33:45 +0800 >=20 > > I should've mentioned that patches 3 ~ 10, and only these, should go > > through net-next. sunxi will handle the remaining clk, device tree, and > > soc driver patches. >=20 > Ok, I just noticed this. >=20 > Why don't you just post those patches separately as a series on their > own then, in order to avoid confusion? >=20 > Then you can adjust the patch series header posting to explain the > non-net-next changes, where they got merged, and what they provide > in order to faciliate the net-next changes. I now that we usually have some feedback from non-net maintainers that they actually prefer seeing the full picture (and I also tend to prefer that as well) and having all the patches relevant to enable a particular feature, even if it means getting multiple maintainers involved. Just to make sure we understood you fully, do you want Chen-Yu to resend his serie following your comments, or was that just a general remark for next time? Thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --z2nmrjqmglrtqum5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE0VqZU19dR2zEVaqr0rTAlCFNr3QFAlrrCtgACgkQ0rTAlCFN r3TTEQ//dlT2EwOiGVvfRHfM+IR3gxYAPc31DfabO7YOoQxJx3kr06qAbVdPqfa8 GrI5JDe14O2QFbaqXwJr5Rv7F8HDNIP7ksSUryaI1zWv9NqFYpU6+adEvl6bPPCx 6snbYpCR8o8UbXWaJUm24hWS4WQnLVVBQREfnT+IQHTks+PETa8TU9/Pjo3Gg8j0 zli5KQsPjt9Yh1e9qczPmhKrixX8ZVqHQ0dPU/9uJlcsBXqj/zGX/Hd6WnWxrXfB OKtbTwpolHfbTT/SF7LDhXo940LCmcyiaM8DmfADUiOrfthCrwes3+1okXC9z5pM E0H5pDSPShfIWCeHq4Xy2NXOteaMf0YFpCZX+pWTV6IzoXGpYFc4FiCBt/2e4miO HhUf3WEhr2M7CaTRsqCStytBYfr7h1tyPJnn8laa+bCJMzMS1XRTVvz56qZ2E+Zx rcoXPIj+Q3AYc+0HfVw9Inf7rVjETmcW2ySx0emlCI1BM5gwoBWCxKH1s48yqW2g 9np9MLHqFtnYJRRTa2BTv2zaL2zg8+yziKtEsdYdk9V1HXLD9DrGkc4RCqBLNdLr LzcYxtcH4/NFfYcTrJ8f2KpdxtGvL7ilV+Ruya2s8jQus/F9NguI73Mus+VH/7w1 jTHLG3jzAsPAXEpcF6NWxWQrldecDo4oa9UxNI6b3B1tOHzO1gY= =Sjp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z2nmrjqmglrtqum5--