netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jmaxwell37@gmail.com
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jmaxwell@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: Add mark for TIMEWAIT sockets
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 17:45:20 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180510.174520.128087783939744310.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180510065351.22535-1-jmaxwell37@gmail.com>

From: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:53:51 +1000

> This version has some suggestions by Eric Dumazet:
> 
> - Use a local variable for the mark in IPv6 instead of ctl_sk to avoid SMP 
> races. 
> - Use the more elegant "IP4_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark) ?: sk->sk_mark"
> statement. 
> - Factorize code as sk_fullsock() check is not necessary.
> 
> Aidan McGurn from Openwave Mobility systems reported the following bug:
> 
> "Marked routing is broken on customer deployment. Its effects are large 
> increase in Uplink retransmissions caused by the client never receiving 
> the final ACK to their FINACK - this ACK misses the mark and routes out 
> of the incorrect route."
> 
> Currently marks are added to sk_buffs for replies when the "fwmark_reflect" 
> sysctl is enabled. But not for TW sockets that had sk->sk_mark set via 
> setsockopt(SO_MARK..).  
> 
> Fix this in IPv4/v6 by adding tw->tw_mark for TIME_WAIT sockets. Copy the the 
> original sk->sk_mark in __inet_twsk_hashdance() to the new tw->tw_mark location. 
> Then progate this so that the skb gets sent with the correct mark. Do the same 
> for resets. Give the "fwmark_reflect" sysctl precedence over sk->sk_mark so that
> netfilter rules are still honored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>

I'm surprised the lack of a mark in timewait sockets wasn't noticed earlier.

Applied, thank you.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-10 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-10  6:53 [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: Add mark for TIMEWAIT sockets Jon Maxwell
2018-05-10 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-10 21:45 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180510.174520.128087783939744310.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmaxwell37@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmaxwell@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).