From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] packet: in packet_snd start writing at link layer allocation
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 20:20:55 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180513.202055.2059612987939748570.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180511172425.213901-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 13:24:25 -0400
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> Packet sockets allow construction of packets shorter than
> dev->hard_header_len to accommodate protocols with variable length
> link layer headers. These packets are padded to dev->hard_header_len,
> because some device drivers interpret that as a minimum packet size.
>
> packet_snd reserves dev->hard_header_len bytes on allocation.
> SOCK_DGRAM sockets call skb_push in dev_hard_header() to ensure that
> link layer headers are stored in the reserved range. SOCK_RAW sockets
> do the same in tpacket_snd, but not in packet_snd.
>
> Syzbot was able to send a zero byte packet to a device with massive
> 116B link layer header, causing padding to cross over into skb_shinfo.
> Fix this by writing from the start of the llheader reserved range also
> in the case of packet_snd/SOCK_RAW.
>
> Update skb_set_network_header to the new offset. This also corrects
> it for SOCK_DGRAM, where it incorrectly double counted reserve due to
> the skb_push in dev_hard_header.
>
> Fixes: 9ed988cd5915 ("packet: validate variable length ll headers")
> Reported-by: syzbot+71d74a5406d02057d559@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Willem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-11 17:24 [PATCH net] packet: in packet_snd start writing at link layer allocation Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-14 0:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-05-24 15:07 ` Tariq Toukan
2018-05-24 15:17 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-24 17:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-24 22:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180513.202055.2059612987939748570.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).