From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/5] devlink: introduce port flavours and
 common phys_port_name generation
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:16:49 -0700
Message-ID: <20180518141649.30f90d59@cakuba>
References: <20180518072904.29523-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, idosch@mellanox.com,
        mlxsw@mellanox.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
        vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        michael.chan@broadcom.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com,
        saeedm@mellanox.com, simon.horman@netronome.com,
        pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com, john.hurley@netronome.com,
        dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
        ogerlitz@mellanox.com, dsahern@gmail.com, vijaya.guvva@cavium.com,
        satananda.burla@cavium.com, raghu.vatsavayi@cavium.com,
        felix.manlunas@cavium.com, gospo@broadcom.com,
        sathya.perla@broadcom.com, vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com,
        tariqt@mellanox.com, eranbe@mellanox.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:37245 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751531AbeERVQz (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 18 May 2018 17:16:55 -0400
Received: by mail-qt0-f195.google.com with SMTP id q13-v6so12111748qtp.4
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 18 May 2018 14:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20180518072904.29523-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 18 May 2018 09:28:59 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
> 
> This patchset resolves 2 issues we have right now:
> 1) There are many netdevices / ports in the system, for port, pf, vf
>    represenatation but the user has no way to see which is which
> 2) The ndo_get_phys_port_name is implemented in each driver separatelly,
>    which may lead to inconsistent names between drivers.
> 
> This patchset introduces port flavours which should address the first
> problem. In this initial patchset, I focus on DSA and their port
> flavours. As a follow-up, I plan to add PF and VF representor flavours.
> However, that needs additional dependencies in drivers (nfp, mlx5).
> 
> The common phys_port_name generation is used by mlxsw. An example output
> for mlxsw looks like this:

FWIW this series LGTM!