From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v15 4/7] sch_cake: Add NAT awareness to packet classifier Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 16:41:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180523.164152.387997944739062215.davem@davemloft.net> References: <152699745846.21931.4558451708304709296.stgit@alrua-kau> <20180523.144442.864194409238516747.davem@davemloft.net> <87in7exg3d.fsf@toke.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: toke@toke.dk Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:35062 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934257AbeEWUly (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 16:41:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87in7exg3d.fsf@toke.dk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 22:38:30 +0200 > How would this work? On egress the core networking flow dissector records what you need somewhere in SKB or wherever. You later retrieve it at egress time after NAT has occurred. > It's about making sure the per-host fairness works when NATing, so > we can distribute bandwidth between the hosts on the local LAN > regardless of how many flows they open. Ok, understood. > But it's not unreasonable to expect people who do NAT in eBPF to > also set skb->tc_classid if they want pre-nat host fairness, is it? And core networking can do it as well. Please remove this conntrack dependency, I don't think it is necessary and it is very short sighted.