From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [net-next] i40iw/i40e: Remove link dependency on i40e Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 23:19:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20180523061922.GA4753@infradead.org> References: <20180522203831.20624-1-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <20180522205612.GD7502@mellanox.com> <079ceee3bc8cd0ea50dd7ddc12b27512ca5ac49e.camel@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , davem@davemloft.net, dledford@redhat.com, Sindhu Devale , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com, jogreene@redhat.com, Shiraz Saleem To: Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:55806 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085AbeEWGT3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 02:19:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <079ceee3bc8cd0ea50dd7ddc12b27512ca5ac49e.camel@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 02:04:06PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > Why would you want to do this? The rdma driver is non-functional > > without the ethernet driver, so why on earth would we want to defeat > > the module dependency mechanism? > > This change is driven by the OSV's like Red Hat, where customer's were > updating the i40e driver, which in turn broke i40iw. Doctor it hurts when I do this.. There is no reason to make a mess of our drivers because people are doing things they should haver never done and that aren't supported in Linux. If Intel didn;t offer any out of tree drivers I'm pretty sure no customer would even attempt this. So fix this where the problem is.