From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sirio Balmelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools/lib/libbpf.c: fix string format to allow build on arm32 Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 18:16:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20180523161624.o3es7omasrshenvk@vm4> References: <20180521065940.srb4rqwaohkn43i6@vm4> <3007a75a-1f1f-64b8-ecd1-e0087fa47403@iogearbox.net> <20180523154928.uh6h5keueumbhs6g@kafai-mbp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Martin KaFai Lau Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:37496 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754710AbeEWQQ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 12:16:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f193.google.com with SMTP id i12-v6so14374475wrc.4 for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 09:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180523154928.uh6h5keueumbhs6g@kafai-mbp> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:49:47AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:41:14PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > [ +Martin ] > > > > On 05/21/2018 08:59 AM, Sirio Balmelli wrote: > > > On arm32, 'cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf && make' fails with: > > > > > > libbpf.c:80:10: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘int64_t {aka long long int}’ [-Werror=format=] > > > (func)("libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > > > ^ > > > libbpf.c:83:30: note: in expansion of macro ‘__pr’ > > > #define pr_warning(fmt, ...) __pr(__pr_warning, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > > > ^~~~ > > > libbpf.c:1072:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘pr_warning’ > > > pr_warning("map:%s value_type:%s has BTF type_size:%ld != value_size:%u\n", > > > > > > To fix, include 'inttypes.h' and change format directive to 'PRIi64'. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sirio Balmelli > > > > Thanks for the fix! One minor comment below. > > > > > --- > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > > index 3dbe217bf23e..e2cc8f10c188 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ > > > #include "bpf.h" > > > #include "btf.h" > > > > > > +#include /* PRIi64 */ > > > + > > > #ifndef EM_BPF > > > #define EM_BPF 247 > > > #endif > > > @@ -1042,7 +1044,7 @@ static int bpf_map_find_btf_info(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf) > > > } > > > > > > if (def->key_size != key_size) { > > > - pr_warning("map:%s key_type:%s has BTF type_size:%ld != key_size:%u\n", > > > + pr_warning("map:%s key_type:%s has BTF type_size:%"PRIi64" != key_size:%u\n", > > > map->name, name, key_size, def->key_size); > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > @@ -1069,7 +1071,7 @@ static int bpf_map_find_btf_info(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf) > > > } > > > > > > if (def->value_size != value_size) { > > > - pr_warning("map:%s value_type:%s has BTF type_size:%ld != value_size:%u\n", > > > + pr_warning("map:%s value_type:%s has BTF type_size:%"PRIi64" != value_size:%u\n", > > > map->name, name, value_size, def->value_size); > > > > I don't think we need the PRIi64 in here. Could you just change it to 'type_size:%u' > > and then cast the 'key_size' resp. 'value_size' to unsigned int? We know at this > > point that the type size value is positive anyway, so we only want to show the size > > mismatch so simple cast should suffice. Thanks! > Good point. 'unsigned int' is enough because the t->size (returned > by btf_type_size()) is a u32. > > > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > > > Thank you very much; respinning patch.