From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: add boot parameters for sysctl knobs
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 15:02:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180523220244.a4u25kapqbjnmpr4@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523121806.GA27675@asgard.redhat.com>
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> Some BPF sysctl knobs affect the loading of BPF programs, and during
> system boot/init stages these sysctls are not yet configured.
> A concrete example is systemd, that has implemented loading of BPF
> programs.
>
> Thus, to allow controlling these setting at early boot, this patch set
> adds the ability to change the default setting of these sysctl knobs
> as well as option to override them via a boot-time kernel parameter
> (in order to avoid rebuilding kernel each time a need of changing these
> defaults arises).
>
> The sysctl knobs in question are kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disable,
> net.core.bpf_jit_harden, and net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms.
- systemd is root. today it only uses cgroup-bpf progs which require root,
so disabling unpriv during boot time makes no difference to systemd.
what is the actual reason to present time?
- say in the future systemd wants to use so_reuseport+bpf for faster
networking. With unpriv disable during boot, it will force systemd
to do such networking from root, which will lower its security barrier.
How that make sense?
- bpf_jit_kallsyms sysctl has immediate effect on loaded programs.
Flipping it during the boot or right after or any time after
is the same thing. Why add such boot flag then?
- jit_harden can be turned on by systemd. so turning it during the boot
will make systemd progs to be constant blinded.
Constant blinding protects kernel from unprivileged JIT spraying.
Are you worried that systemd will attack the kernel with JIT spraying?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-23 12:18 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: add boot parameters for sysctl knobs Eugene Syromiatnikov
2018-05-23 22:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2018-05-24 7:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-24 23:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-25 16:50 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2018-05-25 19:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-29 8:37 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180523220244.a4u25kapqbjnmpr4@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox