Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso

[Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> I just hacked up a sendmmsg extension to the benchmark to verify.
> Indeed that does not have nearly the same benefit as GSO:
> 
> udp tx:    976 MB/s   695394 calls/s  16557 msg/s
> 
> This matches the numbers seen from TCP without TSO and GSO.
> That also has few system calls, but observes per MTU stack traversal.

Reviving this old thread because it's the only place I saw sendmmsg
being mentioned.

sendmmsg shouldn't be considered as an alternative, but rather as a
complement. Then instead of the application building one large request
and request the stack to fragment it, it could simply build the
sendmmsg request and the stack would group the mmsg into a gso skb. It
seems more natural to the application. But well, both (sendmmsg and
the option to fragment) are Linux-specific..

For that we need sendmmsg to do something smarter than doing several
sendmsg calls, yes.