From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: switch the VIA 32-bit DMA quirk to use the struct device flag
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 08:19:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180528061859.GA4145@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805280808280.1585-ecDvlHI5BZPZikZi3RtOZ1XZhhPuCNm+@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:10:40AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> n Fri, 25 May 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> x86/pci-dma: ...
>
> Please
>
> > Instead of globally disabling > 32bit DMA using the arch_dma_supported
> > hook walk the PCI bus under the actually affected bridge and mark every
> > device with the dma_32bit_limit flag. This also gets rid of the
> > arch_dma_supported hook entirely.
>
> Shouldn't this go before the other two?
Which other two? The boot optional removal patches? They just remove
the visible interface, but keep the implementation which is converted
to the better mechanism here, so I think the order makes sense.
But I might be missing something..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-28 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-25 14:35 refactor 32-bit dma limit quirks Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] ia64: remove the dead iommu_sac_force variable Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180525143512.1466-1-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] core, dma-direct: add a flag 32-bit dma limits Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180525143512.1466-2-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-25 14:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <20180525145012.GA3863-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-25 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 16:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] ia64: remove iommu_dma_supported Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86: remove a stray reference to pci-nommu.c Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-26 19:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: remove the experimental forcesac boot option Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180525143512.1466-6-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86: remove the explicit nodac and allowdac option Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180525143512.1466-7-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-25 14:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: switch the VIA 32-bit DMA quirk to use the struct device flag Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180525143512.1466-8-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805280808280.1585-ecDvlHI5BZPZikZi3RtOZ1XZhhPuCNm+@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
[not found] ` <20180528061859.GA4145-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805280817310.1585-ecDvlHI5BZPZikZi3RtOZ1XZhhPuCNm+@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180528062725.GA4309-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 6:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805280823240.1585-ecDvlHI5BZPZikZi3RtOZ1XZhhPuCNm+@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20180528083931.GA7169-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-28 8:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180528061859.GA4145@lst.de \
--to=hch-jcswghmuv9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).