From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: bridge: Notify about bridge VLANs Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 13:55:35 +0300 Message-ID: <20180529105535.fhap2w4tvj3tesei@mwanda> References: <645c0bde19cffebb0dc603872ef6ab45e9fbf0b6.1527519997.git.petrm@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, idosch@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com, razvan.stefanescu@nxp.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, davem@davemloft.net To: Petr Machata Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <645c0bde19cffebb0dc603872ef6ab45e9fbf0b6.1527519997.git.petrm@mellanox.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:11:04PM +0200, Petr Machata wrote: > @@ -580,6 +591,9 @@ int br_vlan_add(struct net_bridge *br, u16 vid, u16 flags, bool *changed) > vg->num_vlans++; > *changed = true; > } > + ret = br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(br->dev, vid, flags); > + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) > + return ret; We should probably do some error handling instead of returning directly? > if (__vlan_add_flags(vlan, flags)) > *changed = true; > regards, dan caprenter